Your points have already been argued, and you still have yet to prove to me where that statement was written in the dev notes. So⌠Were you able to point out where this was said in the dev notes weâve discussed previously, as you have claimed?
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
Saying âAs you see it,â is giving your opinion. While I respect your views, it still doesnât prove your point. Iâm asking for proof to back up your claims of what the devâs said as being âfactâ, so I am sorry, but Iâm afraid that isnât answering my question. So allow me to repeat.
Was this stated in the dev notes, as youâve claimed? Yes or No? If yes, please quote where in the passage they say âthis is a buff, not a revert.âStill waiting on the evidence.
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
You made the claim that the devs stated that the last set of changes âwas a buff, and not a revertâ. I have asked you for proof of this, and your answer is âLook it up.â I look it up, and ask where they have made this statement. And now you are responding with platitudes, and avoiding the question by saying âI already done so.â Without being able to back up your claims, provide evidence, or give an explanation to said statements.
So unfortunately, so far you have not done anything to prove that the devs did in fact say âThis is a buff, not a revertâ, regarding the most recent Mercy changes, and have not disproven my claim that âit is actually both, not one or the other.â
And once again you have failed to answer my question. So I suppose I shall ask for a third time.
You made the claim that the devs stated that these changes for Mercy was a âBuff, not a revert.â And you are trying to state that this is âfactualâ. So I humbly ask you once again, to allow you defend your case and not prove that you are merely giving an opinion as if itâs fact:
Is the statement âThis is a buff, not a revertâ anywhere in the developer notes as youâve claimed? Yes or No?
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
And with that, I believe itâs fair to say that you have no proof of your claims, and are repeating the same answer, due to not having any evidence to back up your opinion to make it âfactualâ, or anything else constructive to add to our little discussion in the form of a rebuttal.
Due to this, I have unfortunately been given no choice but to believe that you merely thought they said âThis is a buff, not a revertâ, to push your agenda, but when asked for proof, is not able to defend your case. It has been made quite clear that such a statement has never been made in the developer notes, and any assumptions that they have are just that, assumptions.
Therefore, I suppose this discussion is over, and I rest my case. But hey! Feel free to give any closing thoughts, this will be my last reply to you (I believe itâs been going on for quite enough anyway!). If you think this is a buff and not a revert. That is totally fine. I believe that it is both a buff & a revert, so we are going to just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that. Nonetheless, thanks for projecting your opinion, I wish you well in your endeavors, and I hope you have a great rest of your day!
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
do you not have a life outside of poop-posting about mercy every week
week in, week out, i have seen you post a topic like this to no avail. you ignore facts and statements presented from the devs, you dig in your heels, and you act smarmy and condescending like a petulent, delusional teenager.
have you ever just stopped and looked at yourself, wondered âWhy am I posting this again?â, or âWhat am I doing with my life?â, or even âMaybe I should stop this, and go outside and breathe the air while itâs still breathableâ.
I sort of envy you, RevertMercy. You ignore the world burning down around you and you keep on trucking for something youâre never going to get. Itâs admirable, in its own way. In its own sad, sad way.
That post wasnât to âwin any points,â that post was to prove how reverts have happened since that statement.
Also, I appreciate your opinion, but Iâm going to have to humbly disagree. Neither you nor I speak for the devs and what we âthink they were talking aboutâ. No explanation on said terms were made either, so itâs safe to assume that what was said was face value and in broad terms, and anything outside of that, is subjective opinion and/or speculation.
I believe that reverting the heroâs voiceline, her healing back to 50hps, and her Valkyrie healing back to 60hps are all examples of past reverts that have occured since said statements. If you donât hold that same view, thatâs fine and you are entitled to that belief. Weâre just going to have to agree to disagree on that.
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
Factually â if you are talking about the 50hps/s->60HPs/s change which was one of two changes in the most recent set of 2 changes to Mercyis â this change is not a revert
Thanks for projecting your opinion, but I am going to kindly ask that you keep it respectful, civil, and on topic. This is a discussion about Mercyâs current state, swapping Rez on E with Valkyrie, and making Mass Rez an ultimate again, not ad hominem, personal attacks, and your personal envy towards others.
Letâs keep it classy, and thanks for your cooperation!
I can totally get behind this. Thanks for your suggestions!
Iâm curious as to what you mean by âweapon switching time?â Also what are your thoughts for an E ability? Should it be Valkyrie? Or would you prefer something else?
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
And hereâs where I solidify my point in one of my previous posts here. I had mentioned that thereâs really only 3 things you seemed to know how to reasonably post here, and this tiny bit alone shows 2 of those 3 things. And lest you should get too optimistic,
Hereâs the 3rd one of those.
Again, youâre basing this off of a voice line change and base HPS changes. Youâve straight up posted this yourself as well, within the very beginning of this thread.
See? Thereâs no comparing these to the literal change of ultimates, much less a full blown rework. Your arguments would hold more water if you actually gave proof that Blizzard reverted a full blown rework of a character in Overwatch. Not some voice line or HPS change.
Unlike some other characters who have issues, you guys HAVE gotten a direct response from the Overwatch Team regarding Mercy. Geoff already stated the following on Emonggâs stream:
xavvy, youâre just in a denial state. However, youâll probably just disagree with the bits in this post as well. With that said, letâs take a look at how many posts of yours in this thread in which youâve agreed or disagreed with other thoughts relevant to this thread up until now; shall we?
Your 'I disagree' posts in this thread are here. This also includes posts that clearly imply disagreeing even if it's not stated:
Iâll even add this post to your list of posts that youâll disagree with, since I can easily predict how youâd respond to this post.
And letâs also not forget any of the posts you have in this thread in which you responded to Megadodo. Which I also find funny because you never did actually answer Megadodoâs question regarding why you use the blush/smirk emojis in relation to the discussed topic. As well as like, nearly every single one of your posts in generalâŚ
As for posts in this thread that you have agreed with:
Post 23(This post can go in both agree and disagree because there is 1 agree bit in. However, note that there are more disagrees than agrees.) Post 258(This is in both agree and disagree since both bits are in) Post 365(This is in both agree and disagree since both bits are in)
Any post of yours that wasnât put here would be seen as âmixed.â Not necessarily agree or disagree, but you see where the point is coming from. And as you can see, I had a far, far easier time finding disagrees than agrees. But even those were offset by other disagrees within the same postâŚ
So yeah; and I didnât see one instance in this thread where you agreed on changes that involved keeping Mercyâs current kit. In other words, the ones that involve Rez ability, and Valk ult. Youâd honestly get a lot farther if you actually suggested changes to Mercyâs CURRENT kit, which involve keeping Rez as a regular ability, and Valk as the ult. I mean, if you really want to try pursuing this crusade, be my guest. But I can guarantee you that youâd be vastly disappointed with a potential direct response, since they will state that Mercy will not be reverted.
I actually havenât noticed the delay in her switch between weapons. I certainly think that would be a nice QOL fix for the hero.
As for her E, fair enough. I personally wouldnât mind it, as long as Mass res is the ultimate (or some variation of it) to balance out the lack of an ability (I personally donât think a weapon switch buff would be enough to remove an ability altogether). Another idea would be to incorporate some form of Valk on E, balanced to suit her kit without feeling like another ultimate, and moving res to be her Q. Titaniumâs thread gave some pretty great suggestions as well that goes into detail regarding her kit without Valk, now that Iâm thinking about it, and something like a sort of Pacify, among other things, in place of Rez on cooldown.
I would certainly recommend checking it out if you havenât already, and donât mind an in-depth read.
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls