"it's not cheating or an exploit, it's a clever use of game mechanics which Blizz tolerates and actually encourages"


#77

Delete all their possessions and money, reset to level 1, but all quests still flagged complete, hearthstone unbound and flightpaths unlearned, drop them in Moonglade.


#78

Lawl. What idiot said this?


#79

oh they were saying this stuff like 2 weeks ago. talk about being freakin delusional.


#80

If it looks like they were also exploiting group grind mechanics I’d go with two month ban and roll their toons back to level 1, 1copper, no bank slots, nothing bigger than 1x 4slot bag, and remove all items you normally wouldn’t have at any level.

Fixed that for ya


(Oniana) #81

Reduce all xp/rep gain going forward by an irrational number in the range of 14% without notifying them :+1:


#82

Soooooo since I’m seeing a lot of confusion (here and elsewhere), here’s some insight into how we draw the line between what makes something a punishable exploit versus a “happy little accident.”

The key factor here is intent. Did the player do something with the specific intention of causing a glitch to occur, and did they do it order to exploit said glitch for their own benefit?

This recent glitch makes a pretty clean example. The players who were abusing it had to do some Very Weird Stuff to cause it to occur, and then did so repeatedly. No reasonable person would expect that this behavior was intended, and the players involved had to go out of their way to cause it. It’s obviously unintended, it’s obviously a glitch, and the people who abused it were obviously exploiting said glitch for their own benefit. That’s pretty open and shut.

Someone mentioned Esfand’s random MC reset in this thread, which is a pretty clean example of the other end of the spectrum. In that case, they just turned up to raid and the instance had been reset. They didn’t do anything intentional to cause it or go looking for reproduction steps so they could abuse it - in fact, they reported it to us and didn’t continue until they got confirmation that it was out of their control (and that we wouldn’t consider it an exploit if they cleared).

Side note for the curious: that was a completely separate bug that has existed since 2004, and actually happened several times back then, it just wasn’t being broadcast to thousands of viewers at the time.

Obviously, neither situation is ideal - we try our best to provide a fair playing field for everyone - but there’s a pretty massive difference between “the instance is reset and we don’t know why” and “if we do this One Weird Trick we can infinitely farm this dungeon boss.” That’s the key factor that turns something from an accident into an exploit.

This ended up being longer than I expected so I’ll wrap it up with one last caveat: there is a lot of context and nuance that goes into these situations, and they’re not usually as cut and dry as these two examples. We end up making a lot of judgement calls based on the specifics of each exploit as well as their overall impact on the game (the phrase “clever use of game mechanics” originally came from one such convoluted situation). These two cases just happen to be pretty obvious.


Fix for Repeat Instance Bug Exploit
Not banning streamers for exploiting
What a disaster (Dungeon Exploit, gold economy destroyed)
Any data released on the consequences of exploits?
"This was a non issue..."
Has any streamers been banned?
You can literally get banned for calling somebody a snowflake
Stalaggs first grand Marshall
Sulfuras, Hand of Ragnaros - Complete
#83

Boom. :microphone::raised_hand_with_fingers_splayed:t4:


#84

Delete their loot, or allow EVERYONE to get double loot.


#85

But what about the people who literally advertise that they are exploiting? Like people who are in general chat all day saying “can someone layer me for mobs please.” That literally translates to “can someone help me exploit.” Why aren’t they being banned?


#86

They will though? What part of “the people who abused it were obviously exploiting said glitch for their own benefit.” didn’t you get?


#87

Can we please get some rough estimation on the number of accounts you’ve taken action against as well as a description of what is happening to their exploited gains?


#88

The last major exploit in bfa a bunch of streamers got 3 month bans and it wasn’t as bad as this one which allows you to farm gear.


#89

Lore I’m sure the Classic team has a solution for dealing with the fallout of this. If you need a case study of another MMO that had this happen check out the boss farming for Neverwinter (the online MMO).

A forum post discussing the issue. It was a big deal at the time for the players and economy.
https://www.giantbomb.com/forums/general-discussion-30/neverwinter-online-s-exploit-disaster-continues-1437576/

These exploits have been possible since head start allowing exploiters to easily farm and sell high level drops from bosses. Most of these have been fixed but the damage is already done with innocent players purchasing the flood of farmed items and incredibly rich exploiters hiding their loot among mules and friends.


#90

Take up your noble ban hammer my lord.


#91

honestly doubt they’ll ever do anything about that.


#92

They should have not taken the loot.

PERIOD.

Delete their items.


#93

As I don’t watch streamers or associate with their ilk, I was unaware of it until the warning yesterday 4 hrs prior to the server restarts for the hotfix.

We can only hope that Blizzard recognizes the seriousness of a streamer publicizing this exploit, and punishes those who did with an appropriate severity.

If we come to the forums and just post about an exploit and how to do it, it incurs both forum and game bans, why should it be any different for streamers who have actually used the exploit as well as publicized it. Sounds like there should be a punishment for the exploit, and a further separate punishment for using the streaming services to publicize it.


#94

He’s a poster boy for Blizzard which is why the example was used to exempt him. :rofl:


#95

They did…those items were deleted.


#96

Source of that?