This game is rigged as hell

Multiplayer Discussion
30

Ridiculous I say. Ridiculous!

My personal rigging theory :grinning: — although it is very much a ‘what-if’ kind of writing, you might like it nonetheless.

By the way, Blizzard introduced ‘pseudorandom’ number instead of actually random ones back in WC3… ironically, with the purpose of decrasing the (apparent) impact of ‘RNG’ events. I could find only this reference nowadays:

https://liquipedia.net/warcraft/Pseudo_Random_Distribution

So they definitely have a track record in this area.

Speaking of which:

Quite possible.

What is ‘advertised’, anyway? :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

A typical example of gaslighting and laying blame, by the way. :grinning:

And another example of those forum psychics, clairvoyants, telepaths and experts in every field in the world. :rofl:

Anyone asking for ‘evidence’ should first provide evidence that they are not a murloc. Oh, and then provide evidence that their evidence is evidence, because I’m still not convinced. :rofl:

PS In case it wasn’t clear enough — and so on: provide evidence of evidence of evidence… :grinning:

This ‘evidence’-mania is really getting… old, as Americans put it colloquially — sorry for my bad English here. :grinning:

Nah, mon: more like monkeys repeating some cliches from second-rate newspapers that they consume, thinking it is a source of ‘information’.

And what is that? :face_with_raised_eyebrow: Some kind of authority for the forum warriors? :rofl: Take a look at this, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OwvGdYGAT0, or at a photo of a ‘perfect girl’ allegedly generated by a neural network (very scientific, based on a lot of data): https://img02.rl0.ru/76bf04b61e8046198667b6eaa57ab294/765x-i/https/store.rambler.ru/news/img/6c9d2cbfba670c47ca75118c0500d13d.

:rofl: That’s worthy of the highest award in epistemology.

:rofl: Another forum ‘guru’…

… thinking somebody here owes them anything.

Oh, I’d ask for the definition of those, but I see no point on this forum.

1 Like