And there we go it sounds like they won’t even be in dungeon blues, greens it is.
the green 2 hander they get in their bag is stronger than MC weapons.
1 Like
I have no interest in engaging dishonest debate tactics but I hope whatever you do believe in, you believe in it strongly. Be well and thanks for the discussion.
Dishonest debate tactics like repeatedly projecting your own biases and strawmen onto other people’s arguments in attempts to imply they said something they didnt? All the while avoiding the original points? Bravo for taking that high road!
2 Likes
Just like the last president that got elected, people will come to see the devastation and ruin in a short amount of time if this goes live.
1 Like
so the 58 boost is basically a 60 boost, i wondered how blizz could get more scummy lmao
2 Likes
Ah, I get it now. Settle down Qaron
They could rant on the forums about how X is going to destroy the world of warcraft then nitpick every little thing they can, making mountains out of mole-hills. That would make them pretty scummy.
Im still waiting for someone to explain how a 58.75 boost + rest is a huuuuuge change and is the final nail in the coffin.
1 Like
This is basically just the logical conclusion of “the boost is for new players to jump right into TBC”. It’s hardly a huge change. Hell the game already has a quest to send new level 1 characters to their trainers and you’ll get one to send you to your major city in the second zone you’re in.
I don’t see why this would be the final nail in a coffin for somebody who thought that the 58 boost was otherwise not already an issue.
1 Like
Bots, and gateway to more store stuff, but mostly, bots.
And going from a 58 boost to a 58.75+rest boost has shifted the botting paradigm?
1 Like
That 75% of a level + rest is obviously absolutely vital in making the boost worth it for botting over just taking that money and opening up additional accounts to have more bots.
1 Like
I’m not against fresh, but what reason does blizzard have to create new servers? Sure some are asking for it… but is it enough people? I don’t think it is…
1 Like
Clearly. Indubitably. Well said! Damn the math!
Everyone knows the OP of this thread is sheer falsehood, this is not a huge change. Anti-boosters just wanted another excuse to rail on boosts although this is more evidence that Blizzard, really just doesnt care what anti-boosters have to say. Especially since we know they will still be subbed, and will certainly be buying boosts.
1 Like
Its because they seriously thought that complaining like children on a forum would stop Blizzard from doing something they dont like.
We told them Blizzard wouldnt back down on this decision.
4 Likes
Something of an alternative.
The boost is happening. Sorry, but it is. The income potential is too great for Activision’s Blizzard to stable the idea of not putting boosts, and potentially other monetized features into the game further down the road. This should come as no shock to anyone.
The battle-lines are clearly drawn.
At this point if you are against the boost you might have an alternative, but it requires a heavy choice:
Subscribe to the notion of “fresh tbc servers” that offer no cash shop and no transfers/boosts
OR
Submit to the current roll-out and accept that boosts are happening. Get over it. And have fun. Do your best to be magnanimous and get over the petty squabble with the people who will be boosting on your server to play there with you.
“But it is not fair!”
“I worked hard for my stuff etc…”
Please forgive me quoting myself on this one but I believe the post is relevant here.
If you are for boosts then you are for bots, there’s no way around it.
2 Likes
this should STAY IN RETAIL.
4 Likes
If you are for classic you are for bots cause guess what bots are in classic regardless of boosts.
2 Likes
Obviously anybody who disagrees with me is just wrong, favours all the bad things in this game, and is probably ugly or something.
2 Likes
What, lol? They can ‘get away with’ anything they want to get away with. They literally own the game.
1 Like