oh nice of you to avoid all the pertinent stuff in my post.
typical whine terran tactic, ignore facts and evidence.
so despite your, and your fellow terran fans claims, the matchup was balanced EVEN BEFORE last patch, which is in fact, not what you claimed.
is it any wonder zergs would be unhappy in that situation?
Blizzard: We think TvZ is in a good spot.
Also Blizzard: we are nerfing two zerg units and zerg creep.
Also Blizzard: we are also buffing widowmine drops and saving Terran resources and time spent on the widowmine invisibility tech.
bro it was a pvz patch BLIZZARD EXPLICITLY STATED IT.
and people literally freaked out over the smallest chit like banes -1 v armored even tho initial nerf to hp was reverted because the tears flooded blizzard HQ.
funny because iâd say the baneling change certainly has an impact. your armored units are more likely to survive incidental splash damage.
iâd also say terran saving resources and tech time on widow mine concealment certainly has an impact, as it lets you invest those resources elsewhere.
but of course terran fans always did ignore facts.
point is. those have an impact on TvZ. either way, that doesnât make it solely a PvZ patch. you can patch PvZ without affecting TvZ.
The best part is that they donât notice theyâre mirror images of themselves. Cauthon made the exact same post after Terran went 8-0 at GSL super tournament. For added irony they have the same portrait, lmao. Are they the same person arguing on 2 accounts?
most ppl have multible accounts and dont want there infomation known mostly becouse alot of idiot then get into a E-Peen competitive âYour Diamond Zerg? Thats Stupid come back when your grandmastersâ is just a stupid arguement, As such ppl try to avoid that stupid BS from happening and just use blank accounts to post.
no, i included all posts that had a comment made in the past 8 hours period. no matter their bearing.
the conclusion? only one thread with a zerg complaining about something and a bunch of threads of other races complaining about zerg or complaining about their race being weak. the majority of them terran.
Yeah last patch i heard, zergs were sending mass emails to blizzard, they wonât ever win anything⌠While they didnât even nerf bane. I bet thatâs reason. They put useless nerf, which again didnât accomplished absolutely anythingâŚ
I mean I kind of understand that but part of writing a persuasive argument is establishing credentials. If you have no credentials, your argument really holds no water.
Itâs one thing to say a race is easy, look I donât even main the race and I got to masters in X amount of time.
Itâs another thing to just say a race is easy⌠and thatâs it.
Which one is more compelling? Obviously this is an example and not necessarily what the case is here, but it happens non stop on here
Dude, could you imagine how crazy the Zerg whining would be if they didnât get an entire free leagueâs worth of MMR just for playing it? Pure pandemonium.
Please explain how you rationalize zerg players getting an entire leagues worth of free mmr when lower league players overwhelmingly choose terran.
You know what the total playerbase difference between zerg and terran is? A little over 26 000. What about their difference in gold and below? A little over 25 000.
Why is it that zergâs difference in popularity is almost entirely made up of their lack of lower league players? Could it be they have high barriers of entry?
Why is it that when we equalize zerg population difference, which just happens to be in lower leagues, their proportional representation in higher leagues becomes totally normal?
Now which seems more likely, a race has barriers of entry for noobs lowering popularity in lower leagues, or that race gives you an entire leagues worth of mmr and also just happens to be the least popular?
Please explain what you donât understand about proportional representation and then explain why you think you can identify the subjective reasonings of a quarter of a million different people?