Sure, try to become a pro and then return here telling us how you wasted two years without any decent achievement.Maybe any player can be a GM, but not everyone can be a pro.To being a pro you must leave everything, no studying, no working, only gaming, you can’t be a decent pro if you don’t do that.
Would be really nice if you were really a GM and showed it to us.
I am from turkey ^^ and gm for many year… game has never been so easy. You can smash keyboard with face to gm. But people in gold do not know how bad serral is… like 10 year old who does not understand rocket…
You do not need achievement to be pro… most “pro” is cannon fodder…
most of those ‘‘pro’’ are not really pro, they are semis and ladder warriors. What defines a pro:
-Has a team that pays the travel expenses/salary/sponsors the player
-Do not study,work or do anthing that is considered as goals, because pro objective is to be the best and winning titles/earn money
-Put hours into the game
-Attends every tournament he can even if its offline.
For example, Reynor and Heromarine, names you know from years ago, but they because full time players not long ago, I think their first year as pro was 2019, heromarine was talking about this on his stream some day, he said that unless you don’t leave everything you can’t really improve enough to becoming a pro, said that reynor improvement came right after he started focusing on sc2 and leaving the studies, same for him, said it was pretty tiresome attending classes from 7:00 am to 18:00 and then playing the game and said the same he said about reynor,once he finished his studies, could start becoming better at sc2 because he didnt have to focus on studies first.
99% of pro will accomplish nothing… they are cannon fodder for top pro to slay in tournament… like stats slay trap… not even close… they in two different universe in terms of skill…
Serral is best in foreign scene at the moment. But skill is not good in pro scene right now… so being best is not impressive… best player from gold leagues not impressive compared to best player from grandmaster…
Did serral win tournament against life and rain? Of course not… because pro was not bad back then…
And that’s why becoming a pro is really hard, some real pro said that the minimum requeriment is reaching at least 6300mmr with no real problems, no just low GM or mid, 6300 is a range in which you will be facing some low tier pros and good ladder warriors, and even starting to becoming pro, it would take a long of time to reaching a proper pro level and almost impossible to reach certain skill level.
Because it is so easy, it is hard? What are you talking about? More forum nonsense…
Its funny how serral only loses to zergs. In tournament play this year, more than 70% of serrals losses have been other zergs…
We may get Serral vs DRG today in the warchest team league.
I’m not gold league, nice try though. I’m apparently more of an expert on the pro league than you though if you actually think players somehow had more skill years ago than they do now. That’s not how any of this works except in your delusional little head. No high level players or pros think HotS had better skilled players. People were still exploding with excitement as if it was some sort of incredible micro miracle when a Terran player split his bio in half against banelings because that was the peak of skill in HotS. Skill level is way higher.
There is no evidence that it’s easier to get into GM now. Literally none.
Cool so when you going to Katowice to beat up Serral? In fact, when you are you showing up to dominate every single pro? Apparently it’s so easy for you, you’re just so godlike, why aren’t you lining your pockets with touny money?
Oh yeah, because you’re on a hidden profile barcode account. 9/10 this liar is a gold leaguer who is just salty they can’t play HotS and get free master league due to low pop count. Until you unhide your account and show rank no one will believe a word from your mouth you coward.
That is a nonsense. Because hots had more players and more tournaments. More players resulted in higher skill peak. That is how bell curve works.
No offense. This shows you are very ignorant to the facts. If you compare taeja vs life in hots the quality is much better than ty vs dark. Players now are very bad. The recent innovation vs drg showed that difference big time! Inno could not beat common hots strategy. Even though it has been nerfed since hots! But players back then could beat it…
Probably even less players, hots was an absolute debacle and the lowest numbers were reached on that expansion. And about skill, right now the level is higher,everyone has gotten better over the time. HOTS gm ladder, I remember you, that was a joke, that’s why the system was changed, now If you want to be GM you must play games, not just the first win of the season, there was a ton of wasted spaces by inactive bad players in the old GM leaderboards
I have a surprise for you, Innovation played bad and is probably a better player than old innovation.The game is also changed, new economy, new units, new meta,new maps, the players are older…you can’t theorycraft and expect the ''same results ‘’ and compare them to hots.
Lotv does not have even as much as end of hots…
He already contradicted himself, as expected from Batz.
Yes it does, rankedft used to show data from hots, and well, around half of hots lifetime the numbers were really low, with lotv the numbers were better, specially after the F2P launch, right now we probably have more players than most of hots lifetime, right now ranked ftw shows 357k 1v1 players all over the world, on the past it was way lower if I remember well.
LotV actually has higher player rates and viewership than both WoL and HotS
You’re seriously out of your mind. At least no one takes you seriously “GM” barcode.
The commoner did not take socrates seriously…
That’s some hubris that you think yourself to be a modern equivalent to Socrates.
Gm league vs gold league…