We always go around the same point, your point of view is that smurfing has numbers so low that it is not a problem, and you make precise estimates in your statements.
You have the opportunity to silence us all, as well as give dignity to your words, give us these numbers and the sources where you got them.
To be fair, it was asked what level of proof is required. Unless the level of proof is “internal only metrics that players can not possibly see”. Since it’s somewhere above a confession, the required metric for your claim isn’t clear.
I was merely referring to your solid belief in something in the face of evidence, to the point where conspiracy theories are needed to bend reality around what you want to be true. I apologize for making that political.
The evidence of smurfs exists - its a hot topic and bliz has said they’re going to do something about it. Please provide evidence to the contrary.
You’re being disingenuous. It’s entirely on blizzard to not allow data transfer when linking more platform accounts, and it’s entirely different to making a new account that cannot be linked to the same master account
Yeah, he said many times in many threads: basically the responsibility that the company does not share matchmaking data and censorship and everything must fall on the end user, do you understand the logic? It has been weeks that those who complain of smurfing must find themselves debating with arguments that not even the most dedicated blizzard lawyer would have the courage to carry on.
I agree with this point. I rarely see smurfs. Maybe down in bronze, where I assume you are vulpes because you just sound like you wouldn’t be able to rank any higher, it is a problem. But I think for the majority of the player base, it’s not an issue.