Warlock shifts the meta in an unhealthy way

I’m tired of explaining that there’s generally no such thing. For example:

or:

or this rather silly one:

No offence, but generally such number are indicative of playing against bots :grinning: (or something else fishy) for the aforementioned reason; in short, you can’t win against yourself, it’s about 50-50 plus-minus small fluctuations… maybe there’s an extra percent or two for really successful players, which is how they make it. That’s just an objective circumstance: HS is HS, more like poker than chess by nature, if you will.

But actually, I was asking about DH’s match-ups against proposed counters, which you have found amusing for some reason.

Is that so?

See, for instance, this meta review:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xd2wnqFcyo

or an older text version:

https://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/welcome-our-demon-hunter-overlords-the-best-meta-decks-after-the-first-balance-patch/

In short, it’s arguably still (!) one of the best decks in the game.

By the way, my opinion regarding the notion of so-called ‘tiers’:

It’s a very arbitrary and subjective concept, to put it mildly, dunno why some people go bananas about these ‘tiers’.