Your right, they made a change, guess we should add lfr, transmog, garrisons, lfd, artifact weapons, azerite powers, all to tbc, because they made a change to make!
You do realize your argument is the slippery slope fallacy right?
Your saying that because they made a change, it means they should make more changes…
What are all these things? They sound pretty cool! Maybe we can also add dog people to the game since you like to make posts on one. I’d be up for it. You should make a post and I’ll add a like to it! 
good thing nobody is getting punished for “simply wanting to play the game”.
Actually no, that is the argument you are making, the actual argument you don’t seem to understand is that #nochanges is no longer a valid argument.
So you should probably make an actual argument against dual spec.
The arguments against it have been given, you refusing to even read them doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
What is the chief argument against it?
Noone can provide any real argument besides #nochanges, which is not considered a valid argument by blizzard.
But hey if you can come up with one please do.
Punishing players for wanting top play the game has never worked and its not going to work. Why do you want a dead game?
They came up with a boost and a mount that can be sold for real money but they are not giving us dual spec.
No fun allowed.
This might be related:
It is inherently against the intended experience of TBC.
This is not a #nochanges argument.
That’d be like saying that being against adding death knights to TBC would be a #nochanges argument.
It simply was not meant to exist in the TBC landscape and affects the gameplay of TBC, making it ineligible for what it is being advertised as, a faithful recreation.
#SomeChanges
Just because you can’t parse the difference between no changes and arguments that are not no changes doesn’t obligate us to hold your hand and teach you.
If you think about it long enough, you might figure it out. Or you won’t and we still won’t care enough to teach you.
Feel free to provide an argument against dual spec that isn’t #nochanges or a complete figment of your imagination.
Feel free to counter our arguments that are clearly not #nochanges or continue to babble on in delusion 
He doesn’t want to change the game because he doesn’t want the game to change. But that’s totally not a #NoChanges stance. No sir!
I do love how he tried to browbeat others for perceived insults and then proceeds to be rude to other people for no reason.
When you make one I’ll happily counter it 
I’m all ears.
Here I’ll make this easier for you:
Is saying Death Knights should not be in TBC because they didn’t exist yet in TBC a #nochanges argument?
If you say no, you’re not being consistent.
If you say yes, cheers for being consistent, but it also makes clear what we’re dealing with; someone who literally couldn’t give a flying rats patootie what changes are added even if it makes it completely unrecognizable to TBC.
Starts to answer…
Wait, why did you ask a question if you were just going to answer it yourself? Are you having a conversation with yourself since you can’t get anyone to agree with you?
What I’ve consistently said is that not all changes are equal Which is why I can be fine with some changes like dual spec yes not fine with others.
But I understand why that nuance is lost on you.