He seems incredibly desperate to trap you.
Youâre correct, not all changes are equal. Literally something weve been saying for weeks.
You realize this notion completely invalidates saying #somechanges right? Since you openly admit that your idea of what can be eligible as a âsome changeâ and is completely subjective to you, right?
What matters is if Blizzard sees dual spec as an eligible âsome changeâ or not.
1 Like
I think he honestly is incapable of understanding that thereâs a middle ground between #nochanges and #allchanges.
If you look up Strawman in the dictionary itâs just a paste of your profile.
#nomorechanges
Especially not ones that are as incongruent to TBC as dual spec.
If you donât mind, go ahead and cite yourself saying not all changes are equal. Iâm not in total disbelief but Im having a hard time remembering when you actually made sense.
1 Like
Changing the words you use doesnât change the actual meaning of what you are saying.
You still have no argument against dual spec beyond #nochanges.
It completely changes it.
I accept the changes theyâve already made.
Therefore Iâm not no changes.
Find a better argument, Iâve seen you stronger, this one isnât working out for you.
1 Like
Welp blizzard considers #nomorechanges synonymous with #nochanges so⌠yeah thatâs what matters.
No, he understand it perfectly. He just canât admit thereâs no tenable reason for why Dual Spec doesnât fit under what he deems an acceptable change.
By merit of his playing the game thus far, regardless of what he says with his mouth, his wallet tells Blizzard he accepts every single change made to TBC that differentiates it from the OG.
He has done that and so he pretty much cannot justify any position contrary to Dual Spec on the basis of maintaining anything resembling the OG.
All he is doing right now is trying to trap you into saying something you would fundamentally disagree with.
Oh really now? Citation?
1 Like
Beyond the changes theyâve been making to TBC?
Wouldnât even matter if the citation existed since youâd find some way to re-translate it as somehow being in agreement with you or ignore it and just reiterate one of your earlier statements as a means of moving the goalposts again.
The fact theyâve made changes is not a confirmation on whether they will continue to make more or that dual spec is an eligible one.
Technically theyâve already made âsome changesâ, so we could also consider their promise already fulfilled. âSome changesâ doesnât mean âendless changesâ.
5 Likes
Gawd, am I good or what?
âUniversal approvalâ Lol. If you want dual spec play retail. TBC is supposed to be rough around the edges, its not a perfect game, but its damn sure better than retail.
3 Likes
Dual Spec is not a retail feature. What are you talking about?
The ability to change specs at will?
It was originally dual spec in WOTLK then eventually transitioned to the ability to freely change to whatever specialization you wanted.
1 Like
Exactly. So unless you want to argue that WotLK is a retail game, you might want to rethink associating Dual Spec with retail WoW.
Itâs the same thing. The ability to change your spec at the push of button is the point. Its easy, makes wow more âaccessibleâ, easy. Again if you want that, play retail.
1 Like
Whatâs the same thing? What are you talking about?
Dual Spec was implemented in WotLK. You just said so.
Is WotLK retail or not?
What kind of circular logic are you following? More to to the point what exactly are you trying to argue? Iâve made my points and clarified them in my posts. If you fail to understand my points Iâll draw a nice diagram for you with pictures and dots on them!