The reason that changes that make the game experience of classic different to that of the original version of the game is because what differentiates classic from retail is what gives it it’s appeal. If the two versions were the same, or similar enough to the point that the distinction was not easily noticeable, then there would be no point to classic’s existence.
maybe because I’m busy replying to 5 different people spamming nonsense mate. I’ve been typing away here for a few hours at this point. I’ll respond when I’m ready.
The only time I’ll ever accept that someone has the justified RIGHT to demand that I respond to their arguments or otherwise prove that I cannot is if the person making such a demand has read EVERY SINGLE REPLY I have EVER written about this topic on both this US thread AND the EU thread because it is only then that they could 100% without a doubt KNOW that I’ve never countered their point before.
Isn’t the way it changes it self evident? Also, I’ve written some of the ways that it does in the OP.
When they’re new yeah probably. We know what the items they start with are, we know they’ll be 58 and the player will probably suck at their class too.
15 years of theory crafting is an in-game feature / system. That is entirely external. It isn’t ideal but it’s unavoidable. As for changes blizz made in classic, you’re assuming that all or even any of them I was ok with or thought were ideal.
Except for the fact that if I did not reply to your later replies then you would say that I then could not think of a response to those ‘counters’ either. It’s a lose lose situation for me. Also, I haven’t been replying to just you.
but you were referring to changes blizz made to classic already. You’re assuming that I’m ok with the changes that were made. Who’s not to say they are changes that I think are more akin to retail or that they were just pointless / caused more problems than they fixed?
But telling who boosted isn’t the problem. It’s the impact they’ll have as a collective that’s the problem.
I know you dont, which is why you confuse your opinions as facts, you need likes to validate your stance, and link others videos to try and make your point
This thread started noble enough with an intention or an opinion just the same but then devolved into name-calling and insult-slinging.
If people are in disagreement with you that is fine - but do not fall to their level and become toxic… So many people do, most of the people who disagree with a thread and reply will become toxic. For those who started the thread with an intention (OP) by falling to their level you are letting them win. As soon as the topic becomes too toxic to convey the point or too riddled with toxic replies it becomes something that is scrolled over/past.
Why tf do I have to, it wasn’t at all part of my argument against boosting…
because we know they exist still. That’s like saying a rogue doesn’t exist whilst it’s in stealth because you can’t see them. Like wtf… Or terrorists don’t exist because they look like normal people…
You are just going off topic with other people. You would notice that what you are talking about with other people is not about boosting at this point. This post is about boosting, focus on it first. And I am not the first person to ask you this and then you avoided the topic.
It’s amazing watching you dance around the topic that you came to these forums for.