They don’t anymore. That was the entire point of the ending of Dragon Soul - they no longer have their titan magic, and it rendered the dragons unable to produce eggs as well.
Aspect is just a formal title now, no different than King/Queen/Warchief/etc.
Mentioned this on a later post, but also goes here: The blues were the only flight to participate in the selection. There was no Aspect for the blue dragonflight, so no titan powers.
There is another possibility that also originates in the book. After the fight against the Twilight’s Hammer, each of the Aspects gave Thrall a scale. Throughout Warcraft history, the scales of a dragon have had special ties to their owners. It is possible that since they are scales of the aspects, they are still aspect scales.
Honestly I have wondered why this has never been used before to bring them back, who knows, maybe it is?
Honestly your joke wasn’t funny or original. It’s been a meme now for like 10+ years to mock transgender people. People might appreciate your “dark humor”(LOL) if it’s actually funny
My understanding was that the Oathstones restored most of their power, with the final Mother Oathstone intended to bring them back to full before Razageth interfered.
None of the Oathstone cutscenes were implemented when I did the quests, and Captain Exposition didn’t mention anything about power returning.
It’s possible they mentioned it, but I doubt it, cause part of the story in one zone is Wrathion and Sabellion fighting for title of aspect after the Oathstone is fixed.
If the oathstone restored the aspect powers, one of them would have already gotten it and there wouldn’t be a decision.
I assume the Oathstone fixed their ability to make eggs, but I imagine that’s probably it. Mother Oathstone will probably be Aspect Powers, as you said.
Her death made me shed a tear. However I thought how they handled her death with the Shadowlands story, it felt well done. And I would have left her dead in Ardenweald. Honestly if we have to sacrifice/lose Malfurion for Ysera that’s terrible story writing.
A humorous retort to obvious jocular misinterpretation of the topic at hand.
Calling John Money scum and mentioning what terrible fate befell the children involved in that particular experiment has nothing to do with trans people, nor LGBT in general.
And I’ll say it again just because it makes me feel good: John Money is dirt in human form.
A joke about ridiculous requirements to have for literal beginners in M+.
A pointless change to a name to signal virtue is virtue signalling, yes.
Honestly I thought the blatant spelling errors and erratic behavior made it obvious I was being facetious. Facetiousness is not bigotry.
Didn’t realize calling someone stunning and brave was considered transphobic or anti-LGBT nowadays. My how time flies.
I see disagreeing with the way the devs appear to weigh things they’re intending to change is also bigotry now.
Yes, I do think people that can’t help but stick their nose into other’s business to make sure they’re not having any thoughts out of line with the supposedly prevailing cultural zeitgeist have earned what mockery befalls them. Within reason, of course; I wouldn’t want anyone to get bashed in the head with, say, a bike lock or a milkshake filled with concrete.
I literally said it was bad. Bad jokes are still jokes.