No, we come in to discuss that Blizzard might potentially be doing some things wrong.
And not “wrong” as in “I don’t like it,” but “wrong” as in “it wasn’t this way in vanilla.” Sharding is a good example of that. So are guild banks, transmog, LFR/LFG, barbers, flying mounts, dual specs, and anything else people have suggested be added to Classic.
We, or at least I, like to remark upon the irony that the official Classic servers hosted by Blizzard might potentially be less accurate than private servers, which should really never be the case.
Yes, it would be real nice and convenient for you to be able to shut us up. Unfortunately, a large number of players interested in Classic are people who wanted vanilla, and continued to play it the only way they could: through private servers.
If it were against the ToS to discuss and/or play private servers (they can’t really prove the latter very easily), then most of the people they’re trying to appeal to with Classic would be banned.
These forums HAVE to allow that kind of discussion.
No, it’s good. Maybe if enough people choose not to play, or at least express that they won’t, Blizzard might consider not implementing those changes, or revert them at a later date to draw us back in.
Uh… very invested, obviously. That’s why I don’t want them to mess it up. Duh.
I pity the folks who would pay $15/mo to play a game they don’t enjoy.
Good for you? Some of us will, so what is your point?
Also, once again, why should I go away and not discuss Classic just because I don’t want changes and express that in no unclear terms on these forums?
Perhaps, but that’s a weaker argument to make when there’s changes to the game. It’s not exactly the same version of the product at that point. Hell, Classic will be hosted on the modern client, but simply using old data.
If a country is willing to make distinctions between antiquated versions of games being hosted versus live versions, I think they’d be able to recognize the difference between Classic and private servers.
Not really. Private servers won’t die even if Classic is perfect, because as you said: “someone wants it free.”
And Classic already isn’t perfect, based on the changes that have been confirmed by Blizzard, so there’s already more reasons than just that.
True, but no single system has to singlehandedly drive away most players. It’s several systems all chipping away small chunks of the player base each.
Everyone has different limits to what they’re willing to tolerate in Classic. The more changes you make to it, the more chances you have at driving people away.
Same, barring any sudden “lol, here’s LFR”-esque changes. While I’m not really expecting anything like that, I wouldn’t be that surprised.