If classic+ adds a new island with 10 levels it's dead on arrival

WoW Classic WoW Classic General Discussion
41

If mages are overturned then why is the majority of players picking rogue and warrior for damage?

Even in HC it’s all rogues warriors and hunters, and very few mages at 60 on horde.

In organized pvp mages aren’t even the primary damage dealers (unless fire yet organized pvp scenarios require frost mages)

If mages are the God emperor class why aren’t you playing it?

If you bring up all classes to mages then rogues and warriors get nerfed so there’s that

Can you provide to us some information on what exactly is overtuned? Any supporting mathematics?

42

Why are you comparing a ranged dps to melee dps.

Most people don’t want to play the tricycle class for hc… even then theworld first was a mage and there’s plenty of high level mages

Okay i said

I literally said to nerf all 3.

43

Meh, I’d be fine with either. Long as it retains the spirit, i.e. the game design philosophy, as Classic.

44

Why are you comparing an aoe/control class to anything that isn’t?

You don’t have any evidence for why people are or are not playing mage. Personally I don’t play them because I hate their downtime you claim they don’t have. I only like them at 60

On horde, there are very few. When I was leveling up I saw them die all the time aoe grinding tanaris and wpl. When I saw them single targeting I never saw them 3 shotting mobs

You are wildly over exaggerating what mages are

45

No thanks! We’ve all seen what freshers do with 'em:

Classic Era is Classic+

46

Its vanilla leveling, more over its vanilla where different classes are different, thats a big selling point for many.

47

If they don’t do classic+ fresh and it ruins the era servers cause the changes are bad then what.

Classic + NEEDS TO BE FRESH.

1 Like
48

Feral is actually really good, it just req you farm MCP enough to have a item restore inventory big enough that you never need to farm them again. You can if you run MCP and WHH and play smart getting all the same WB be top 3 on many bosses for MC and BWL, and still hella strong in cat for AQ / Naxx. Bear is always good.

Legit the only complaint I have is that the pre-aq tier loot (like fury warrior) is basically pointless outside of healing some when its handy.

49

It will be, stop worrying about this bit.

50

Never cave to freshers. Classic+ is already started in Classic Era, where it will continue.

51

The only thing I want from Classic+ is new content. I don’t want more levels or an increase in character power. Just new dungeons/raids to learn, zones to explore, and experiences to have.

I wouldn’t say no to some tactical class balance changes (ie, paladin taunt) but that’s it.

I kinda agree with the OP. If there’s a level increase, or any kind of power progression at all, I feel like Blizzard missed the point of what folks want out of Classic.

52

I corrected your demand list.

2 Likes
53

my opinion > yours

54

I would very much dislike a raise to the level cap. They should just add like a Naxx20 thats hard but has good gear and a new 40 man. Also swap around talents, and add dual spec.

55

Oh your reaction will be rich when it’s announced on a fresh platform

56

If classic+ is just a new raid tier/ level increase/ new island it is dead on arrival.

If you want an end game game, play retail.

57

Agreed.

Meh but fine.

No.

I simply want them to add new zones/areas to explore in the existing Classic Azeroth with new quests and dungeons (yes even a raid or two).
No tinkering with graphics or adding things (races/classes/abilities/features/etc) already found in expansions.

1 Like
58

lol, you guys slam the Retail game as garbage and actively want them to make new stuff for Classic. Brilliant, really.

1 Like
59

retail is actually awesome.

60

Relax.
Dream boarding can’t hurt you.

1 Like