Video games are no place for politics
shoo, both you and the left go away
i get enough of that from thanksgiving dinner
And amuses me that people on the left are so unaware that there were better candidates that did not get a chance because of the way she was appointed.
If I’m remembering, there’s some strong suggestion that he pulled out because while it was intended for him to be a spoiler (look at the states he and the greens made sure to at least TRY and get on the ballot on and it’s just the swing states) but because of his anti-vax and other conspiracy based policies he was really popular with the Q crowd (they do love them some Kennedys, even if they not actually Kennedys) and was pulling them from Trump who they’d normally support.
This is true, but it’s also true because - generally speaking - the left, or, socially liberal paradigms were friendlier to LGBT communities, advocating for their ability to equal marriage rights, being one. It is also true, generally, to say that the LGBT community is friendlier to the left/socially liberal groups because of this. Just as it would be true to say corporations are, generally, friendlier to fiscally conservative groups/coporation-friendly groups.
it unfortunately does because until everyone has equal rights, their path through our society is different than others simply because of the rights afforded to them.
Fair enough, doesn’t really change the fact that I was speaking of the people in my original post to which you replied to:
Not of the political organization associated with them, which just means we talked in circles for nothing to be gained.
We have a political organization?
Both sides say that about any 3rd party candidate, because they want to preserve the establishment.
Who?
LGBT friendly means you support equal justice under the law and equal rights in jobs, housing and families without regard to majority / minority status. It’s a Civil Rights issue.
Right or left leaning has to do with politics.
There wasn’t. You do remember when this happened right? You couldn’t have someone else come in with zero money to run this late. Kamala was the only one who had access to the donation funds and she’s perfectly qualified for the job (unlike the other guy).
There’s even someone mocking schizophrenic people naming themselves after such and somehow they haven’t gotten slapped by a game master yet for that OR their chats.
IIRC someone named themselves after the TempleOS guy and just mocking schizophrenia.
Why is it fair one group can advertise but not another?
Not very inclusive.
I swear some people need to go outside.
No, Trump would golf. When we was President, he did so on 428 days (1461 for a term).
For the record, Obama played a lot of golf too, ~308 days over two terms. Which was considered “a fairly remarkable amount.”
As much as I like the Dark Brandon memes, Biden would probably ignore Trump because Biden would want to mini golf.
people on the left, the ‘real’ left and not just liberal - e.g., non-capitalists - are very aware of the differences. The difficulty is, many of us are forced to vote on social issues primarily. Economically, there are differences between dems and republicans, but, seeing as they’re both capitalist, they’re not truly leftist, at least, in an economic, classical sense.
Who? RFK? How is he remotely better than Harris? He’s a conspiracy (and worm) ridden moron. The best thing you can say about RFK is that he’s not as senile as Lord Dampnuts.
Art and politics are like cheese and crackers. Separable, but pretty complementary.
None that I support, but Cornel West and Marianne Williamson both seemed more eloquent and knowledgeable.
…yes? It’s literally in the ToU.
Your statement is that you want to be able to say things that will offend people.
The ToU explicitly forbids that.
Golf is boring I don’t see the appeal xD