Disparate AV queue times are a thing. HPH premade honor farm meta is a thing. The majority of players putting more emphasis on farming rank/rep over winning is a thing. These things influence whats happening with AV whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
Could the map conceivably exacerbate these problems? Sure, in theory it could and thats my #1 issue here. Speculation about the map is no longer presented as theory or an educated guess but as the full and complete truth while it ignores every other reasonable, rational and plausible explanation.
If we are using Occam’s Razor, in light of 15 years of alliance success in the BG, in both vanilla as well as PS history, not to mention the classic premade days, a sudden drop from overwhelming wins to overwhelming losses, then the “reason” is the most simple explanation: players.
Occam’s Razor does not mean “my favorite explanation”.
But you’re not you’re talking horde vs alliance and claiming horde are somehow just better at AV, which we can clearly see is not the case or it would be reflected in the other BG’s.
The mechanics are the way they are because that is what players demanded with classic - no changes. Hence the mechanics are fine.
The issue have is with the Horde Strategy that Alliance players are choosing not to try to counter and you’re demanding tha Blizz address the lack of initiative on the Alliance side to favour your faction.
Yes, but the fact that the other two BGs are not similarly lopsided means it is something specific to AV, rather than Alliance PvP, that is causing the discrepancy. And we have one such cause that is definitively supported by empirical data.
Which is not supported by data from classic which is the exact representation which we have from 15 years ago.
Alliance was doing just fine with Av in vanilla, but now loses. the maps are the same and yet Alliance continues to let themselves lose. That Data says its not the map that it the issue
Av is just not that complicated its not particle phyiscs that takes years to figure our, people were playing the same methods as they were 15 years ago. Alliance players are just not motivated enough to put the effort in for a win.
Again the ‘data’ you refer to is the same ‘data’ from 15 years ago and it does not support your conclusions
Yes they were when they saw the option they had. and the best way to win was to burn down the Alliance which was done at the time and now. The thing your complaining about now was done 15 years ago and the Alliance as able to deal with it but chooses not to today.