Welcome to the entitlement group. This is the group of people that WoW has begun to cater to over time. The longer we go, the more of these people are going to show up.
5 Likes
Twinking being in levelers bg queues is pretty entitled if you ask me. 
If you really wanted to work for kills and fights you’d be for twinks being put in xp-off queues again.
Yeah they’re reaching now. They can apply a generalization based on shared interests- twinking, acceptable. A generalization about a shared fictional race is racism? Come on.
3 Likes
Blizzard disagrees with you. The majority of the playerbase disagrees with you. I disagree with you.
I’m sorry you couldn’t titanforge your way to victory in your games.
1 Like
The majority of the playerbase actually agrees with me, actually. Blizzard also agreed with me, but as you put it; catered to the entitlement of twinks. 
Sounds familiar.
1 Like
I am starting to think its this 1 other guy who was posting before as a worgen he was mentioning he had like 4 accounts and he switched alts a lot. probably the same guy
1 Like
Alrighty then.
I have a feeling it won’t be the first time you’re asked this… source?
1 Like
That’s for island expeditions, which is PvE content and not PvP. Now who’s grasping/reaching? That one has nothing to do with BG xp on/off queues.
They also wanted to change that, btw. The source you cited shows Blizzard didn’t want people to turn off xp
…
1 Like
To curb this behavior, we plan to implement a hotfix in the coming days that will disable the ability to turn off XP gains on characters level 110 or higher. Additionally, any character of that level who already has XP disabled will find it automatically re-enabled the next time they log in.
and again, does not talk about xp off/on separate queues.
Right… that should tell you everything you need to know about Blizz’s mentality on the issue.
When they were considering turning of twinking it was for PvE purposes (which they backpedaled btw)… it wasn’t even about PvP… at all. If Blizz was on your side as you claim they would have turned it off bc of twinks wrecking in PvP. That wasn’t even considered in the decision. They don’t care about low level pvp, they never have.
1 Like
Since you didn’t read the post, or are too obtuse to comprehend it, I’ll just leave you to your error.
Blizzard wanted to stop powerleveling, but wanted to allow me to continue to farm people at 110. People like you and the other twinks that inhabit our bracket. Thanks.
1 Like
False, they wanted them in their own queue which is why they had them in a diffent queue system but entitled twinks complained about wait times.
The post specifically doesn’t talk about separate queues.
Right?
Imagine linking the thread where they planned to disable twinks for PVE purposes as proof that Blizz is against twinking in PvP.
Like wut
1 Like
I didn’t link the thread, Demon did. Maybe Demon should be throwing insults at you too.
Excuse me I should have said “reference” not “link”…but you knew damn well what I meant.
Your pedantic reply really remind me of another worgen that looooves to sidestep substance and argue semantics…
Its funny because this guy doesn’t even realize that merging the twink brackets was kind of an accidental oversight that Blizzard then came out and clarified with the 110 post. XP ON/OFF was merged when templates were a thing. The templates were removed and now the brackets remained merged. Us twinks held our breath as we expected them to cater to entitled players with white gear on, but lo and behold, Blizzard redeemed themselves by expressly stating that the intention of the XPOFF feature is for lower level players to stay in a bracket and twink.
Yet here he is saying its because twinks complained. Laughable. Imagine thinking that twinks were on here posting daily about their brackets for an entire year.
2 Likes
I didn’t even reference the thread myself until it was brought up in an argument about PvP and separate queue systems which it doesn’t talk about at all to pander to their own argument and fail. Which is what you seem to do best.