RT is about teaming up with random strangers to try out new builds and have fun, meeting new people.
AT is about honing skills to win. What is so important is RT is a no pressure setting, while AT is full of pressure to win just like 1v1.
It’s like if the two settings were Gyms, RT would be the planet fitness, and AT would be golds gym. imagine mixing the two. Right now, AT is dead in classic and RT is very alive. RT is where most people in classic play nowadays.
If the two are mixed it will be a disaster because you can’t play for fun with no pressure anymore which is the default place people go to escape pressure and have fun (and it’s also the most populated)
As blizzard can see in classic, AT is dead currently on most servers while RT is still alive. People Love RT, it is the backbone of the game. don’t ruin wc3 as we love it.
Need quote on Blizzard’s supposed intent to mix RT with AT.
Need quote on “People Love RT, it is the backbone of the game.”
AT is currently dead since it’s technically impossible for most people to play it (unable to host games).
attack? youre the one attacking the OP saying his post “reads” like a diablo conversation… you clearly dont know what you are talking about and saying “builds” is an RPG term is hilarious
im honestly in shock that somebody who plays wc3 doesnt understand that each race has worker units (peasant, peon, acolyte, wisp) and that worker unit is used to build a base… in RTS base building is a big factor in choosing a strategy at high level play
the term “building” should not be used in RPG games just for choosing a class/faction armor or spelltype… thats not building RPG games are about level grinding lol
they were always separate playlists in WC3, but in SC2 you can play AT vs RT which is incredibly unfair for RT players and gives AT players a big advantage
This has nothing to do with single player, which is why its really annoying for somebody who doesnt play multiplayer to come in and talk sht about something he doesnt understand
