Not saying it was. Pointing out the fact that “oh look the supports got buffed (minus Brig and Mercy) where’s this support Power-Creep everyone was fortelling?”
mercy makes moira and ana unusable
;dfl,kasnfjkasnfksjfbjsrnbfgjsknfjsfnsjfna
ana not only makes mercy and moira unusuable but also replaces moira in the only niche where she actually works
“sKilL!”
3 Likes
“heal-creep” threads were popping up here and there just before the support changes, then it happened and people were magically fine with it 
1 Like
Exactly.
Habit, hope, finding other heroes to be even worse, etc. I certainly would never be interested in playing any other hero than Mercy because the DPS game genre doesn’t really appeal to me. Mercy was different and appealed to a MMORPG player such as myself. In difference to many other Mercy players I uninstalled the game when the enjoyment I got from playing Mercy was no longer worth it. I haven’t played Overwatch since January.
My favorite argument is ‘but MUH-AIM SKILL!!!’ When it comes why Ana needs to be better than Mercy and if Ana does become the new ‘must pick’[starting to look like it] she will need to be nerfed just like Mercy.
2 Likes
Right now some people think Brigitte is some sort of super powered monster but her pick rate is pretty bad, i guess this proves them wrong.
1 Like
So Mercy is boring and other heroes are even more boring? Then, why are you playing the game if it’s so boring, i don’t know it doesn’t make sense to me.
Every hero in the game is unique one way or another. Do you mean she is easy to play? or doesn’t require aim? Because a lot of other heroes are like that as well.
1 Like
Of course she’s playable. You can still select her in the hero selection screen.
However, her state is not okay.
5 Likes
It does actually make that claim rather suspect. Historically, in Overwatch, OP heroes have had rather average winrates but high pickrates. Brigitte is the converse of that, so it raises the question of why Brigitte would be the sudden exception to the rule among the cast of purportedly OP heroes. I haven’t seen a good answer to that yet.
1 Like
They did. Here are examples and there were many. Everyone puts more focus on their own heroes. But Mercy mains supported Ana mains and wanted her buffed when she was in bad shape. The same is not true the other way around.
2 Likes
It’s almost like they’re in denial. We need Gordon Ramsay.
2 Likes
All supports were playable before the changes, so I don’t see much of a success.
There’s about a billion heros that aren’t ‘‘typical fps genre hero’’ they can play those too
I think we know why it’s mercy that has a high pickrate.
Or do we consider reinhardt winston genji hammond for example typical fps heros now?
Mercy was the most popular in quickplay. Ana took over in comp, where people play to win more often, especially in the highest tiers.
But Quickplay is by far how the vast majority of people play this game, and she was the most popular there.
She’s incredibly popular no matter how weak or strong she is because she’s a draw for people who aren’t traditional fps players.
In addition, if you google “Ana Overwatch” and “Mercy Overwatch,” on google.com you get about a million more results for Mercy than Ana.
She’s a beloved and popular hero irregardless of her relative strength or weakness.
2 Likes
Indeed. I too strongly believe that pick rates are what matters most as it shows what heroes are powerful. I’ve played a number of competitive games and that always seem to be the case, just in the OWL the most powerful heroes had extremely high pick rates but low win rates because of obvious reasons, on the other hand, usually, low pick rates mean more win rate because more often than not only one team will have that hero.
1 Like
As I said in the post that you quoted (but conveniently cut short): I am not playing the game and I have not been playing since January. Mercy became boring to play so I uninstalled the game.
2 Likes
I think they achieved something nice by making almost every support playable.
But I also think that doing so by making a dominant support barely playable, if not unplayable, will be costful at long-term.
As it stands, Mercy’s kit needs to be addressed in a way or another sometime - in my opinion - and when that happens, who’s to say that other supports won’t be power-crept again?
There’s always to possibility they’ll eventually rework her to play as a reliable main healer again without being so dominant and overpowered, but balanced - and I sure hope for this -, but I don’t know what they’re planning for her (if anything at all) at this point.
I think the main issue with Mercy right now is honestly how unfun she feels to most people, which is entirely subjective, but it is something that’s been coming up quite a lot lately.
(Then again, in my case, I find Moira super boring and even more unfun and many people don’t agree with that notion, so maybe it’s just me who wants Mercy to be funnier to play as. It’s also no secret that I’m craving for another super fun 3 stars main healer like Ana, but with an entirely different kit.)
Edit: Still haven’t got a flipping idea as to why my forum avatar is still Mei.
What is fun is subjective. As long as people still pick Mercy and she proves to be viable Blizzard will think she is fine because that is what matters and AFAIK both Mercy’s pick and win rate are still pretty good, even though is hard to say since numbers are not reliable due to private profiles now.
1 Like