Why I Have Yet to Not Despise Mercy's Current State

I believe it has been covered extensively already

Unless you got that one very good player with you. Mercy can fix mistakes of one player, but not multiple and not too often. Everyone else got their permission to die.

It’s not “high skill”, when you simply need good teammates, it’s high luck.

1 Like

Still, be so kind as to enlighten us all what your definition of Anti-Mercy is. The public is just dying to know!
Then again, since you’re just going to repeat some nonsense about covering it elsewhere, I decided to go searching for your so called “definition”.

And since your so called “compromise” thread is a rework: The Dodo Mercy Rework v1
That makes you both “anti-mercy” by your own definition, and a massive hypocrite.

5 Likes

While we are all in this one large thread, can we just make up a genuine definition for this silly term, and direct people here any time one of us sees it used? I know it seems like a lot of work, but dodo seems to be doing fine, constantly directing people to other threads.

4 Likes

According to dodo, anti-Mercy is faction of players asking for changes. Which doesn’t really fit dodo’s own thread about changes.

6 Likes

I explained that the rework thread is an attempt at forming a compromise position rather than something I want; and as such, there is no hypocrisy

You are of course welcome to come up with your own terminology and/or definitions.

I look forward to the results

Explain all you want, that’s still hypocrisy, as you’re “Anti-Mercy” for even calling it a Rework by your own definition.

3 Likes

Resorting to being condescending, again? Really?

3 Likes

I have explained it, and it isnt hypocrisy

I see an attempt at compromise to be a very good thing, given the deep divisions we see here on these forums over the subject of Mercy

And you seem to be trying to make them even deeper. After all, you say

And you make a thread about making changes to Mercy. I see someone needs help with languages if someone’s having a hard time here.

8 Likes

I don’t see anything in my statement to be condescending

My statement is a sincere expression of my thoughts on this matter

And more condescension. That’s adorable.

All of this is explained in the op of the thread in question.

I personally dont see any issue with an attempt to reach compromise between two deeply divided sides

I do not need any help with language (s)

First off, look, another loop! Second off, you say it’s explained, but you don’t really explain it there either, you just say something akin to this being your attempt at a rework. Which, as you say, is an Anti-Mercy thing.

4 Likes

The thread in question here is an attempt at finding points of compromise

I do not favor the rework…I would prefer to keep Mercy as she is, snd this is explained in the op in the thread

But your thread is called a Rework in the title, riiiiiiiiight? If you want to call it a compromise, maybe change that title to say as much? Just so you’re “clear and concise” as you’re fond of saying?

After all, there is no one rework idea, so

sounds a bit out of place. Unless you’re talking about your very own rework thread.

2 Likes

The thread includes the term rework in the title because the compromise involved and under discussion would involve a rework, particularly the “use rez on living target option” piece

1 Like

But I thought you were against reworks as they’re “Anti-Mercy”.

I would encourage you to re-read that thread. Your questions are answered