What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
I donāt really understand what you mean here. Though Iād argue that modern day livestock farming and its relationship to nature is pretty much the antithesis of balance.
Ok first off, these teams are mad unfair. I like our odds in a debate, but not an Overwatch scrim. Cuthbert hasnāt even played in years, and as far as Hulk goes, having the rest of us on his team would be considered cruel and unusual punishment.
I am not sure anyone here is actually arguing that there exists no skill difference among the player base/ the different ranks. So I donāt really see the point in this other than for shāts and giggles
The average SR spread among these teams is huge and I know weād get the floor wiped with us. Might be fun though. Weād have to impose some hero limits or other caps to make it at least somewhat competitive.
Receipts unironically has said that in the past that and this dude believes as a season 3 silver player he could be t500 if MMR didnāt exist. Which is funny because if he placed nowadays heād be closer to b500.
To be clear Iām not going that far. Itās just a bad, illogical argument. If SOME people can get to top 500 in an MMR system, then obviously anyone of equal or higher skill could do it under the same conditions.
I see a lot of bad arguments from people on my side of the debate, and I donāt condone any of them.
He makes some articulate cogent points that, in my opinion, lead to where the evidence points. But some of it is just suspect or unfounded.
As we talked about before, I think most people have the basic hardware to get to top 500 (whether they have the grit, determination, ingenuity, and cleverness is a different story). But you canāt claim that actually accomplishing the feat is just a formality. And thatās too bad because Iād love to attain glory by relaxing on the couch.