I know of no valid data to support the claim of three quarters
Well if you donât feel like playing solotank you can always ask for second in my suggestion. Same for soloheal.
NEVERS EVER!!!
But it wasnât up to me.
I didnât force Blizzard to change their game. No tank or support player forced Blizzardâs hand.
This is from the man himself.
How unexpected, oh my god
I had a bet with my GF how long it will take till someone complains about it
I always have enough healers on the team. Itâs always the tank role that goes unfilled, with there usually just being one and not even a main tank.
The thing is, Heâs talking about the mod where you can play only 4-1-1. While Iâm talking about the mode where you can choose what you want to play.
Jeff not finding 141 to be fun does not then mean that â141 isnt funâ is a fact
His statement remains an opinion
Many players, myself included, enjoy playing 141 in Freedom Queue
Iâm not complaining about it. Just trying to say âplay QP classicâ argument is stupid.
Guess that means 222 is a success then.
Notice this part here.
I wasnât there for the discussion. They could have gone over every possible scenario in Overwatch. From double tank 4 DPS, to single healing 5 DPS. I donât know, nor will I ever know. They also could have talked about lunch.
What we do know is that from these discussions came forced 2/2/2 role queue.
This just proves how utterly broken was the non rank mode, even more so how broken ranked was too
And what I know there is a better solution. At least for me.
Right now your only arguments against it is just âwell devs probably thought about it, so noâ.
I donât think Blizzard agrees with you. If they did, role queue wouldnât be a thing.
I donât really have to argue my position. My position makes zero difference. Blizzard came up with a solution to a problem. The problem has been solved, as far as I know, to what Blizzardâs intent was.
My solution would be to cap off each players accounts to what days they can queue for DPS. Each player can always queue for tank and support, but throughout the average month they get 2 weeks to play DPS. This will cut DPS queue time by 50% or more. There will also be a whole lot of crying, so I know my option is not going to happen.
I know of no valid data to support the use of the word âmanyâ.
I have a good argument against it. It will realistically mean you opting in for an EVEN LONGER QUEUE for people who go outside of the format of 2/2/2 because 2/2/2 is the general accepted composition and will have the most players in it.
It will die as quickly as itâs released. Itâs a waste of development time for an obvious fruitless adventure that will break down. The people who opt into 1/4/1 or 3/2/1 or whatever will require you to find tanks and supports who actually WANT to play in 4/1/1 comps. And those will be rare as all hell.
It will have too many problems to be worth even considering.
you only want to play dps but not waiting?
qp classics is the place to be for you.
people like you did not care about solotanks or solosupports for years that many left because of it.
hereâs news for you: less and less support and tank mains will play qp classics ⌠give it two months and blizzard can rename it into a pure Deathmatch mode.
Clarification: By which context are you referring to âmanyâ?
: consisting of or amounting to a large but indefinite number
: being one of a large but indefinite number
as many
: the same in number
he says thing like this alot it common, and the claim of only getting 4 dps on a team twice in 36 matches.
Not really. If you choose to queue for 1-1-1+3 any you can fit into 2-2-2 comp, but also in 3-2-1 and 4-1-1 comps. So, at least somehow shorter queues.