Do people REALLY think GM pickrate matters or does it only matter to undermine how a heroâs general pickrate is good?
Letâs follow this logic through, how many heroes who have EVEN WORSE pickrate in GM would be disproportionately affected by Roadhog being buffed in this particular way?
Who has REALLY low pickrate in GM? Itâs Reaper, itâs Bastion. Reaper gets so close tha Hookâs travel time doesnât matter, Bastion is stationary where hookâs travel time doesnât matter.
My prediction is that GM pickrate suddenly wonât matter with these heroes.
I am not saying Roadhog doesnât need a buff, I am saying that this is the wrong sort of buff.
guys
Roadhog did need a buff
this buff gives him 15 more damage
it just makes it easier to 1shot 225/250 hp targets
which is his job
to bully heroes out of position
by no means will this make him broken
by some way it does
then we can revert it
but it is way too early to tell
Funny you calling me âarrogantâ.
It is Blizzardâs mess, Blizzardâs responsibility to fix it. Definitely not yours, an unqualified user who wants to quell others. You have a problem with that, take it up with Blizzard to shut down the forums.
Ahnn, yeah! (though I do not hate the character itself)
If you had bothered to click my link to BRUTALly NERF Roadhog you would know exactly what are the reasons and the solutions.
You feel yourself trolling, thatâs why.
Roadhog has been underperforming for years because of his lack of damage. And, the moment he gets some form of viability, people start whining for nerfs?
You act like Jeff Kaplan wasnât around to talk about that roadhog balance change before he left. Iâm sure these balance changes are discussed in meetings well before they are announced.
Wow, âthanksâ for the trollers to flag my post as âtrollingâ, I pity you all for handling very poorly my intensive legitimate criticism to Roadhog.