If your definition of exciting is curbstomping everyone who isn’t playing DH then I think it may be a you problem.
3 Likes
Nope. Not what I said. Read it again. I said it needed nerfing, they just should’ve taken a bit more time with it. Simple.
1 Like
Number of games is far more important than number of days, any statistician will tell you the same.
2 Likes
Not sure why you think they should take more time. DH is at an almost 50% winrate. They succeeded while doing the job quick.
1 Like
Number of games over a ‘period of time’.
1 Like
We’ll see. Again, too early to tell. Let us not judge the data right after the nerf, but in few weeks time?
Fair enough, let time be the judge.
compare number of games in those 2 days to entire number of games in a season and ull see how small of a number that is
to late nerf already in place b4 time could do its thing and ppl were allowed to think and figure out how to counter dh on their own
1 Like
10k games is enough to get a fairly accurate result.
1 Like
no its not when you look at the total playerbase of the game and compare it to how many games total are played per season its not even close
Is that a bad joke you do in these forums? Where is the super overturned class now?
If sac pact costs 1 it will be a piece of sadness, so stinky, mainly for wild come on … play better with the super overturned class … same without the nerfs it was a bit obvious the first pick should be Zoo Warlock with sac pact, because the expansion has a higher amount of demons and also demon hunter class and it is a sure until better good strategies take a body.
Priest got demons bro … it is balanced, don’t punish me because you don’t measure your plays with the odds about the opponent answer your plays very well.
What is the OP talking about? DH still beats almost everything.
2 Likes
It is enough to get a reasonable idea. 30k games is enough to be within a 5% margin of error. I guarantee hs replay had 300000k g a mes before the nerf was even announced.
1 Like
not to be rude but at this point u sound like a broken record…and frankly so do i since you wont look at facts that upset ur version of how the game should be played
I do look at the facts though. The data support ME, not you.
5 Likes
facts and data arent the same thing, ur small amount of data from around roughly 36 hours of gameplay at most isnt a statistic that has been built up over time and as the say if something hasnt survived the test of time its not a proven fact
Facts are proven by data. So where is your data disproving anything I have said? You dont need 2 weeks worth of 70% win rates to see you dropped the ball in a game with millions of players. In this case it was abundantly clear within hours.
5 Likes
The entire meta is targeting it right now. Sac pac ranges from meh to horrible against literally every other deck in the meta other than demon hunter for
Example. It’s far from “dead” from my experience. It’s just not as easy to steamroll an opponent as it was before.
the deck still performs insanely well. I got forced to play it today and all i did was mash the button and play on curve and I went 3 and 0 for my quest pack.