Gormer insulting their alts is peak comedy, folks. Get your popcorn!
If I had written this I would have been suspended within 5 minutes of writing it.
Ask me how I know.
oh sanji has been suspended plenty. sanji luvs my flags
Yes sure the game is rigged. The single person with unsupported anecdotal data is way more accurate than the millions of data points from deck trackers from the data sites. Somehow those millions are all in on it so their data is not accurate.
What are supposed to believe the âItâs riggedâ club again?
I have not once seen 20 of the same deck in a row. lol Are you nuts? Decktracker should prove you right if this insanity actually happens.
I haveâŚ
After I chop up and cherry pick which matches I count as a deck I faced consecutively. IE played 100 games in a row with 20 of those games vs the same deck becomes I played 20 games in a row all vs the same deck.
So if youâre not a simpleton⌠u could do an ez search and find out the term âconspiracy theoristâ is an ad hom.
Created to attack people asking 2 many questions about the JFK assassination.
Its used primarily to shame people into silence by calling them names.
So when you use the words you out yourself pretty handily as naive.
Or are you using the words to shame people so they will go awayâŚ
Much like the continuous use of the word âracistâ to shame people noticing they are being genocided.
Iâve never said I wasnât. Relax, my man.
I want my gd 90 packs for 20 bucks.
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE
I am not even sure if this is the thread or the other thread is the other thread but I am a few drinks in so since we all agree we are all the same person, lettuce form a forum gang and terrorize the peasants!
Who is in!
10/10 replay
You sound at about the right level of intoxication to reach top 1,000 legend. Well done!
I am being 100% honest, I just beat a dude at D8 playing all core cards⌠how does that happen? They were all golden too. A quest at D8? didnât care?
BOTS!??
Algorithm confirmed.
No clue. I am messing around with a meme DH running outcast and relics, still beating people (grant it, I am only at high gold (I need to seriously climb )). Maybe itâs that they donât know what the hell theyâre dealing with?
Thatâs insane.
If two people debate whether my smartphone can send emails, itâs not something that canât be settled. Itâs not both.
Even for a person claiming they prefer vanilla over chocolate, thereâs ways to test whether they actually prefer vanilla. They could be lying.
When American politicians debate each other thereâs this thing called fact checking. The politician claiming a political affiliation to an established party in no way means they wonât lie to constituents, right to their face.
Hell, thereâs always the possibility theyâre in disagreement, arguing about something, and theyâre both wrong. Or both lying. Specially in USA.
Oh sure, because politicians in the USA never lie or spread misinformation, theyâre always truthful and have the peopleâs best interests at heart.
You canât sarcastically agree to the opposite of what a person writes.
Well, you know what they say: âSarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of philosophyâŚsaid no one ever.â
The only thing rigged is that worse players will win less and face more of the alleged âriggingâ. The reason is simple if you play sub optimally and give your opponent extra turn they have more chances to get the miracle outs and get the feels âriggedâ comebacks. The game doesnât favor one outcome over the other.
Also another thing that is probably contributing to the âriggedâ feeling is that people go in with cobbled together incomplete decks and face fully fleshed out meta decks and that not the matchmakers fault it simply a product of queuing into constructed format. It happens in real life paper games too. When I started playing paper Magic I would play against people in my shop playing since Alpha using Vintage decks with my Standard deck and die turn 1. Even if I player against other Standard decks mine were budget version of card I happened to open vs full meta decks. The same kind of thing happens in Hearthstone. Games would feel âriggedâ simply because of the disparity of card quality. When the fully flesh out meta deck constantly get 2+ for 1 that would make people call âriggedâ but that not what rigged means. Thatâs what people on the other side are trying to say the âItâs riggedâ club âriggedâ is not what rigged actually means.
The game is unfair to people that donât have all the cards but thatâs a product of playing constructed formats in a card game. Blizzard did their part to make it more fair by how you now gain gold. It used to be you could only complete quests by winning and only from winning 3 games on ladder. Now you can complete quests by playing game or doing other objectives like play x type of card y times and you get gold base on experience which you gain from time played. The system doesnât care which side wins in any given match. It has no incentive to favor one side over the other as both sides would gain gold to increase their collections.
Exactly. Was a long time MTG player who did some FNMs. People brought absurdly powerful decks for whatever meta regularly. Me not being rich got my face kicked in lol. Netdecking is just the reality of any DCCG or CCG. Itâd be nice if our pet decks didnât blow but only so many cards are gonna wind up viable in any set.
Thatâs why I think the original Jumpstart was one of the best things they ever did.
But WOTC screwed that pooch.