Like most people I consider each request independently, but as long as I’m amused they should be ok 
Well, of course, amusement should always be the primary factor when considering requests! Who cares about things like feasibility, importance, or whether it aligns with your goals and values? As long as you’re having a good laugh, everything else can just go out the window. I mean, who needs to make responsible decisions when you can just base everything on your current level of entertainment? It’s not like consequences exist or anything. So go ahead, throw all logic out the window and make decisions solely based on your amusement level. It’s the surefire way to success and fulfillment.
Who knew there was some crazy just waiting to come out!
Well, it’s always good to discover new things about ourselves, isn’t it? Who needs stability and sanity when you can let your inner lunatic run wild? I mean, why bother being a functional member of society when you can be the next star of your own personal horror movie? So yes, let the crazy out and see where it takes you! Just be sure to leave breadcrumbs so we can find our way back to reality.
Not to rekindle but…
You DO see over years and years and years, NUMEROUS people, for WHATEVER THE REASON… lets call it a dumb reason, whatever…
You can’t deny that A LOT of people see weird stuff in regards to matchmaking.
I’m sure you have too, you just immediately dismiss it because you can’t prove WHY you just faced 20 control priests in a row and when you switched decks, you didn’t see a priest for two days.
FINE, you can’t prove anything.
BUT YOU’VE SEEN IT
2 Likes
Thing is, this doesn’t happen. It simply does not. Even at the height of DK and DH dominance, i never faced 20 in a row of anything. I track my games. There’s no such streaks.
It’s all just confirmation bias; especially because guys who say this NEVER track their games. They never come here with “Look, i was facing 25 Dks in a row, after using this card they disappeared, then they came back when i took it out”.
THey never do that, and they never track their games, because it’s all confirmation bias. They WANT to be targeted so they can have an excuse for their middling winrate.
3 Likes
FYI, I agreed with everything you said.
The part that I quoted is definitely a reflection of your terrible personality and sub par upbringing.
My winrate has nothing to do with seeing strange patterns.
Show to me where are the guys seeing strange patterns because they are winning too much? Curiously, it’s always the guys losing huh? Never a aggro guy saying how they steamrolled the 26 priests you would have faced in a row.
Suuuuuuuure, my terrible upbringing that made me
checks notes
verify if what i think i am seeing is actually true
1 Like
I have been on the positive side of streaks, I streaked like 4 games past the achievement.
It’s almost like good and bad streaks happen in random enviroments and we tend to remember what we reinforce huh…
Curious thing, this randomizing thing.
Has it ocurred to you to y’know. Track your games and show us the 20 priests/DKs/DH in a row that always go away when you change decks?
1 Like
I only came here to see when the patch was coming out. I didn’t expect to have an entire clown show.
Thanks boomer.
Gotcha Karen. Good to know.
You are making a fool of yourself.
It’s kind of weird to type messages to yourself.
1 Like
I vote for you as the leader.
1 Like
I’m not being a contrarian, you just sound like a child.
Please let this thread die, its got so out of hand and off topic.
sure, but was it a win streak against the “same” deck/class/counter/best matchup/etc.?
this is the unbelievable part of the losing streak claims. noone has a problem believing streaks happen. the claims made of “weird/spooky” patterns, that consistently repeat, but can’t be backed with hard evidence is the issue most people here are suspicious of.
1 Like
There’s a very simple reason for this: most people cannot properly classify patterns as random or nonrandom. They will experience random and be convinced it is nonrandom and vice versa. This isn’t a controversial opinion, it’s a fact backed by numerous studies.
Izizero has seen the same things you’ve seen — well, not exactly the same, but the same kinds of things. The difference is, you called it nonrandom when it’s exactly what randomness would predict. In a truly random system, sooner or later you’re going to go against the same deck 5 times in a row. Randomness is streaky. And the #1 way to tell the difference between genuinely random series and a series that a human is trying to pass off as random is that the fake series will not be streaky enough.
You are not “seeing strange patterns.” You’re seeing a very strange absence of patterns. That’s what random is. But the human mind hates an absence of patterns so it has a tendency to think of randomness as a kind of pattern. This is false.
TL;DR: You literally don’t know what random looks like. You’re not qualified to point at what you’ve seen and label it nonrandom.
3 Likes
It’s impossible to distinguish satire from the real thinking of conspiracy theorists. This is 200 comments later for me, and still, the best argument being made is from popularity. This is absurd.
3 Likes