New priest cards (including a resurrection one!)updated

[Schyla-1490]

Original thread:

New Priest Legendary: Mi'da, Pure Light

[Legendary · Minion · Fractured in Alterac Valley · Divine Shield, Lifesteal Deathrattle: Shuffle a Fragment into your deck that resummons Mi] A new Deathrattle for Priest. It’s sort of like Rogue’s Waxadred, but the minion itself is stickier, so it’s more likely to actually be able to do something. The Fragment is a Holy spell. This should be pretty annoying to get rid of unless the opponent can transform or silence it, but it’s also a bit slower since the resummon relies on your card draw. …

You squirmed around a lot in that thread refusing to come up with a metric. The metric you wanted to use was something that a 5 star card would need as I pointed out. You kept squirming and wouldn’t agree on a stat. Nevertheless, I kept tabs on Mi’da.

I replied back to that thread telling you it was time to admit you were wrong. You refused and gave the excuse it was too early.

Then, almost eerily, VS launched its first report and talked specifically about Mi’da in #222
https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-222/

Mi’da received a lot of criticism before launch, but the legendary is actually pretty good in these decks. Not its fault.

It’s also included in lists. The card is good. The card was good. Players were using it in quest priest.

They even have a deck specifically called Mi’da Priest
https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/decks/mida-big-priest/

Furthermore, ANYONE here who was in that meta can tell you Mi’da was a good card and it saw play despite the fact you acted like it wasn’t and didn’t.

Melphina also posted several times their success with Mi’da. She can even further debunk you here stating that Mi’da was a good card.

So, again, why would I make any bet with you? You said you have never been wrong about a card prediction and you were clearly wrong. You still, to this day, haven’t admitted you were wrong.