Idk about you, but I know I’m losing an extended game where Druid has 16 max mana and I have 10, no matter what I’m playing
With that in mind, I’d rather he finishes me fast with a 16-dmg Trogg rather than prolong the agony for 5-10 minutes more
It ends the same… and without the New heights, Trogg is balanced - if it wasn’t, it would be run in EVERY iteration of Druid and Warlock decks, which it isn’t
no no no, you missed it, the “(really the only thing that annoys the crap out of me with those is that Crescendo is a fel spell)”
Ah, yes xD
Selective memory, I guess
Well, noone is perfect, so even my boy Smeet can sometimes faulter xD
I just don’t think that deck needs a popgar full heal is all.
The damage isn’t a huge deal.
Play less Diablo and more Warlock and you’ll see the deck needs that heal like plants need the rain xD
As I said before they nerfed that Splish-Splash: it’s hard to balance Druid because it’s a mix of cards that creates Druid’s conflux of crazy. Splish-Splash Nest Matron, Marin, Eonar, Doomkin… all of those cards would be fine on their own but together they create silly non-games often.
It’s pretty obvious most whiners against ramp druid haven’t played the deck at all. It’s a very uneven deck; you can’t make a good curve half of your games because most cards are completely split between early game and late game; you basically spend half your games waiting to die since if your first 3-4 draws are bad you will basically die unless the opponent was also horribly unlucky.
I checked the meta stats of today now; literally a dozen archetypes may be better today at the top of legend; I’ve said before how you read stats is subjective but there are definitely ways to find druid not being that devastating at stats today without much effort at all.
It’s not often people confess to cherrypicking stats: good for you 
Like the moon over
the day, my genius and brawn
are lost on these fools. ~ Haiku– Bowser
Dude, what? I have played the deck. I’ve played it around 50 games this expansion and I win a good majority with it because of how broken it is.
This seems like a you problem in piloting the deck. I don’t have this problem at all.
The downside of the deck is waiting for any of your draw pieces. Once you get those, the deck blasts off. So if your Chia Drake doesn’t hit Sleep Under the Stars, the deck slows down.
But the deck has so many tutors and draw cards that it’s not a problem for a long.
The deck is strong for a good reason.
You’re doing this “I checked the stats and…but if you check the stats and it goes against what my stats say, it’s a problem with the stats you see” argument again.
I don’t know why you guys do this when you know I bring receipts.
You guys always make these claims about stats, and yet I bring the images to show everyone else how wrong you are, and you guys go into a nose dive of denial.
So, here we go…AGAIN
Honestly, can you guys stop lying for once?
Dragon Druid is complained about because it deserves to be complained about.
“There’s literally a dozen archetypes may be better today at the top of legend”
It’s easy to turn people into monsters instead of learning something; it gives you the delusion you know everything; sadly it makes you a worse player too.
I looked at meta stats on hsguru. Stats are extremely subjective on how you read them; e.g. I may read meta archetypes on 100 samples; it’s still a valid way.
See how well I predicted this?
I wonder if he even understood what I said. Probably not. The poor guy can’t make an argument without turning people into caricatures in his mind.
I brought my receipts to show your claim is wrong.
Just show yours where you prove you are right.
Otherwise, stop telling people Dragon Druid has 12 decks that are better than it at top legend.
This part is true, actually
10/73 games, less than 1 in 7, less than 14% Druids today, where until yesterday, there were 24+%
Some new decks, couple of Rogues, many pallies, priests and DK-s, mostly on the ladder today
It shouldn’t be
Absolute winner!!!
It does. It’s just, people have found counters, and now it’s suppressed a bit. We’ll see what happens next.
You keep saying nonsense like this to people who actively play and rank in mid to high legend. What do you plan to accomplish with this?
People are losing to Druid left and right because it’s broken. You said it yourself, top legend doesn’t matter much for most of the playerbase, so why bring it up now if you don’t even play there?
You certainly don’t listen to what people on this forum who play there say. No, you try to bring us down so you do not feel inferior.
You shouldn’t be jealous at our ranks. If you played as much as we did, maybe you’d be even better. Noone is thinking less of you because you don’t play in high legend, if your takes are good.
But we’re thinking less of you if you behave like you do towards us.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt. Your rank is not an argument, just your daily empty flex.
You might wanna listen to that quote yourself, especially before sending it to others
It’s both, actually. It’s literally an argument. It means that what I say works in practice.
Adding what ranks I’m playing at is important in case someone who disagrees is higher rank than me. If that happens, I wanna know, so that I can learn from that person.
I’m obviously not going to listen to what you say. Unlike me, who has an attitude problem and a high rank, you only have an attitude problem. Sucks, but it is what it is.
Classifying it as “Dragon Druid” always seemed a bit weird to me. Pretty much every druid deck is “dragon” in some form or another. It’s got the standard package then gets modified from there. Why is that? Because the 9 cards they gave them in ONE BLOODY SET was a huge mistake. If you are going to do that for one class you have to do it for all.
Creating Marin in the follow up set was just them thumbing their noses at the player base.(That was the politically correct way of putting it) Even worse is that this deck has single handedly created other decks not druid that are WAY WAY more toxic and offensively good in order to compete against it.
And that’s why you are bad at analysis. Correlation does not mean causation.
You’re just a good pilot that only plays netdecks you never designed.
Correct. The dude can be a good pilot with bad takes.
But it’s far more probable that a good pilot has good takes than a mediocre pilot.
Your argument here should be to prove him wrong, not to deny his rank as a measure of his knowledge of the game (which it is).
Also, I’ve seen you call legend 500 dumpster legend. Say what.
People start calling top 1k legend top 1k legend about five hundred ranks below where he was, lmao.