The current state of the game is precisely why I NEVER buy your pre-launch garbage. Your launch is NEVER balanced. Your team can either not do math or they are not given the time to properly balance (my vote is on the latter).
You seem like a toxic company that thinks time / output = money. No, QUALITY = money.
If the game had quality and had a balanced mindset, I would 100% pay for it. But as it stands with 2-3 classes constantly in the 40-45% win rate at a level that counts, no. You get nothing. I refuse to believe I am alone in that mindset.
Exactly the reason why this is the 3rd expansion in a row I didnât pre-purchaseâŚ
Every launch games gets to unplayable state unless you want to âabuseâ one or two broken decks.
And then of course we wait for nerfs for 2-3 weeks, then they buff something and then that is broken, another wait for nerfs, mini-set, broken again and waiting for expansion, expansion launch rinse repeat.
But now they will say âHey, we did emergency nerfs 2 days after launchâ but so what if they did absolutely nothing to the outliers.
Dude, all you do is complain and complain and complain. I hate to break to ya, but youâre not the target market for the game. And those of use who do pay for the game, donât have all these issues that you seems to constantly post about.
I guess you havenât tried to play standard only to run into the endless wall of DKâs with the occasional Paladin or DH thrown in. Thatâs it. Thatâs the game we have. And his numbers are right. Itâs a valid complaint, and itâs all over the forums. Iâve played 16 games today. 70% DK. Itâs pretty silly for them to have launched an expansion with tons of new cards like this.
Your entire post was conflicting. I am the target market even though I donâ pay? And the people that do pay cannot do basic math? I mean, I donât doubt the people that pay cannot do basic math, because that in itself is a wild conflict.
Maybe if you started to use your brain you would have these issues. IDK, donât just throw your wallet at something so youâll âwinâ. Think about that. Mandate quality of money, request integrity for dollars spent. Maybe thatâs a foreign concept to you, if it is I feel sorry for your and your immediate society.
This is exactly what is wrong with the economy right now. People do not demand quality for product.
Iâm 100% free to play and Iâve hit legend 2 months in a row now. Enjoy the game, donât pay Blizzard any money, and log off when youâre tired of it.
DK is the only Class i donât have in Gold, thatâs the Reason i playing it the most, and thx to Blissard to make it easyer to reach that Goal! So do other People as well maybe?
There is another, more likely possibility: The launch is deliberately unbalanced in order to force players to buy more packs. There are always only a few OP decks you can win with. Everybody who wants climb the ladder, is forced to play these decks, is forced to buy more packs. In my opinion the dev team isnât incompetent, this is the business model of Activision Blizzard they have to follow. Pay for win or suffer.
= Hearthstone is pay to win, as mentioned above.
If you donât want to pay for the game, you donât really have a chance to play at a competitive level. People who spend 100$ at every launch have obviously much more success than f2p players. Thatâs why complaining is futile. Pay for win or suffer.
It was really fun, right up to diamond⌠after that its all dks, or turn 5 thadius locks⌠the ocassional pure pally, 1 or 2 priests, the unbalanced DHs⌠all i can do now is wait for a balance patchâŚ
who are you kidding? Itâs the same way in gold. currently stuck at gold 10 because everything, aside from the rare, and broken, Druid, everything is a DK, bot or otherwise.
Pure paladin, frost dk, blood dk, relic dh are pretty much the best decks out there.
A few cards got changed but they are still the same.
Undead priest, Imp warlock, Chad Warlock, Totem shamy, are also old decks that perform more or less well.
Yes totem shamy wasnt rly played but its still old stuff mostly.
Outcast is a new deck.
If you rly want we could call some of those decks changed but not rly new.
Anyways my main argument are the top performer and those are practically 90%+ old stuff.
Edit: those decks that changed to much rly struggle or aint working at all, for example big beast hunter and big spell mage both would qualify for beeing called new imo