Maybe he’s thinkering with the results to try and confirm his claim? I know I won’t believe in w/e he posts after this long time for such a simple task.
In most cases of pushing at the end of season when you have 2k+ paragon.
What some people do not get is that main stat is more beneficial until you recoup it from paragon.
Balancing a game off the 1% is not ideal either, we need to find a common ground.
BTW, my solution is a locked affix, which means an additional affix.
Okay Meteorblade, two more bows to go, a little bit of collation, and I am posting the results.
And whether the results confirm or refute my initial assertion, they will be posted.
And like I said, since I’m crafting these bows, I’m looking at some information that goes a little bit beyond just whether or not they have one particular property or not. And like I said, I’m learning a little bit about how Google Sheets works, and so far I like it.
Exactly why I have a link to a screenshot of every single item. And I don’t mean to post any spoilers, but it’s kind of looking like the overall graph is going to resemble what Meteorblade came up with.
For other interested readers, please be advised that this thread is discussing the crafting outcomes of various bows for Demon Hunters in Diablo III. This is not a discussion of what may come in Diablo IV, nor is it a compare/contrast discussion of the two. Please refrain from discussing Diablo IV in this thread.
This thread seems to be missing your data on this subject 
2 Likes
I’m working on it. Give a guy a minute. You guys are so impatient.
No-one cares what other affixes the weapons have because they are entirely irrelevant to your claim that there’s a 1:8 ratio of Main Stat to Vitality on crafted weaponry.
The results I got were an almost exact parity, i.e. a 1:1 ratio, of Main Stat to Vitality, which means your imagined 1:8 ratio wasn’t anywhere close to being correct. This is why, when you make claims that are so evidently false, that I enjoy responding to them with facts, evidence and maths showing that they’re false.
Posting your results in the same format as I did, i.e. just plain ASCII, for 450 crafts should have taken you no more than a couple of hours. You’ve had over five weeks at this point and have failed to provide them.
We’ve been more than patient in the face of your prevarication.
1 Like
Wow…Does that mean I’m fired…or expelled…or something?
lol
It means you need to go back and re-sit Statistics 101.
You’ve already said that your results from 450 crafts had pretty much the same ratio that my 180 crafts had, i.e. parity. That admission means that regardless of whether you bother to post your results or not, it proves that your claim of the 1:8 ratio of main stat to vitality was complete nonsense.
Not that I expect this will be the last of your long-running “this is how I feel about RNG and statistics” series of threads. It’s always fun to see another one so I can pop on my debunking hat and have a chuckle to myself.
By the way, its been a week since I disproved another one of your theories about how you thought the game works here. It was hilarious that you’d tell me that I should play the game more because what I claimed wasn’t right. After I posted screenshots showing that what I had said was absolutely correct I notice you stopped responding.
1 Like
With the sweet time you took you could easily cherry pick screenshots of items that provides whatever ration you want.
lol…You are so English… 
Actually I never saw those screenshots, because I forgot I posted in that thread entirely. But that is very curious. Normally, everything would be locked until after you open the chest…
But as it turns out, you’re right, as your screenshots prove.
And of course I tested something completely different, which was the ability to change skills while in combat, and at what times the game considered you to actually be in combat. Why would I test skills when you were talking about gear? Well… One of my idiosyncrasies.
But yes, you are completely right about the gear, while the information that I posted was concerning skills, while Paragon points can still be changed within the Greed realm without limitation.
When you see the screenshots, you’ll see why that would be highly unlikely, if not impossible to do.
Yeah, I’m looking forward to 2020 too…
It’s an American expression, not an English one, which is why I used it…
The first recorded use of an introductory class being designated as “101” was in a University of Buffalo course catalog dated 1929. It wasn’t until the early 1930s that universities in the United States started using a three-digit system to identify their courses.
By the late 1960s, the phrase was starting to enter the vernacular at large, outside of the collegiate realm.
Sorry, I should have specified the “re-sit.” That’s all English! Americans would say “re-take,” or “repeat.” Americans take a class. The English sit for a class. 
How have you got time to argue about semantics?
Shouldn’t you be publishing your crafting results?
Geez…testy… Actually, I am modifying some formulas so that they will provide useful information in the grand scheme, rather than just repeat the same information over and over for each bow. Standby.
Still standing by…
2020 is rapidly approaching.
Do you reckon you’ll publish in the same year you said you would?
[ EDIT ]
For some reason you made a completely new thread with the results…
1 Like
The reason being I wanted a topic about the results, not a topic rife with derailments about D4, and other useless retorts. But you found it, so there it is.
And those results, similar to my own results, proved that your claim of 8:1 ratio of VIT to DEX were not even close to being true, with the overall results of my 180 crafts and your 450 crafts being a ratio of approximately 0.9:1
3 Likes
And so what’s your point? Trying to keep that post count up? Waiting for someone to give you a pat on the back? Waiting for me to? Keep waiting.
It’s pretty obvious that not you or anyone else looked at the damn spreadsheet or read the summary, or you might have some opinion on crafting other than, “I’m right, you’re wrong, nah, nah, naaaahhhh!”
Infant. I’m done with you, dude.
My point was that your claim was feelings based nonsense.
My 180 crafts debunked your claim.
Your 450 crafts debunked your claim
Our combined 630 crafts debunked your claim.
I only looked at the portion of the spreadsheet that was relevant to your claim, i.e. how many of your 450 crafts had main stat, how many had vitality and the ratio between them. Everything else was irrelevant fluff that you added for your own amusement.
The reason I have the opinion that I was right and you were wrong is because my data, your data and our combined data proves I was right.
Ah, so you’re back to insulting me again because I disproved your claim.
That demonstrates admirably who’s being childish here.
Also…
So, you get emotionally motivated, make furious forum rants, get angry but you don’t get upset at all. This is why no-one believes your claims about statistical results. You base your threads on how you feel things are, rather than how things actually are.
This is why I tend to not believe the claims you make because, when we actually investigate them, not once have your claims been substantiated.
Next time you make such a claim, make it with your evidence so we can analyse it because “Trust me, it feels like it’s broken” is a really bad method for deciding if something’s actually broken or not.
3 Likes
I had missed this thread and read it all at once. Damn it was painful to read. Meteorblade: A+ for patience, well-deserved.
1 Like