People on both sides doing that. I can do the same thing with grabbing quotes. With stuff like… Mr Gonna mute you RocknRolla lol
Or like these people who say “purists never have an argument” when it literally was already on the forums an I just copied it for him cause he doesn’t want to read the posts.
You have yet to present an argument. I’m waiting and all you have are words describing these arguments qualities.
Just saying it’s up there somewhere doesn’t count
This again… it’s funny how all the people “Pro Ploot” say the exact same thing, yet ignore all the posts already made rebutting it.
wrong i have already explained how it doesn’t affect ffa in a ton of threads to the ffa only clique but you have all ignored that.
Here’s the explanation again. So I will assume you understand min/maxing an time management an understand playing games on a competitive level. When a game is created under your “accessibility options” you create two types of games. FFA or Ploot. Both modes drop the same amount of items. But on FFA 0% of the loot is protected so you’re guaranteed no loot when you play it. On ploot the loot is protected 100% of the time when it drops for you… this protection is based on a percentage of drops or Odds. So if you primarily are just joining a game to level your “accessibility option” would change the core mechanics of the game. Because I can either A: Join a FFA game an have a probable chance of getting nothing. Or B: Join a ploot game which every time loot drops for me I will get it if I want it 100% of the time. This is called “guaranteed loot”. If you are trying to maximize your progression you would be an idiot to use FFA over ploot when grinding xp in public games. So the accessibility option would change the meta for anyone not in a premade team trying to speed level to remain somewhat competitive on ladder.
It’s all bunch of BS man. This game is 21 yrs old these people should be adults by now but act like children.