You refuse to listen to your community (about twinks)

It can also be solved by keeping up with gear.

You don’t care gear matters, but it does. You will be rolled over by other levelers who care about gear. Just like what happened for 8 years.

Levelers that wore full BoA’s and still quested. Or ran dungeons.

Separating twinks won’t stop me from gearing up my toon and rolling over the lazy levelers.

That’s what it comes down to, being lazy. BG’s are for PvP first.

PvP= player vs player.

4 Likes

I like that you’re putting words in my mouth now. That’s fun.

Can I claim that I’m secretly you? Since you’re speaking for me, after all.

2 Likes

that acronym stands for player versus player

I think we get the message that PvP= player vs player by now. I’ve done a fair bit of it in my time. Oh and I just hit 219 honor level.

Anyway this twink thing will be sorted out eventually, if it stays your victim pool will reduce that is for sure. If it changes you will all complain, and quit or say you will.

Lets see what happens.

3 Likes

Here’s the TL:DR for anyone skipping to the last page.

Dude wanted to pvp at low levels. some people had more stats at that level than he did and now he wants the president of wow to have an emergency court hearing.

9 Likes

Given the subtlety and tact with which Blizzard seems to be fixing every issue this expansion I’m wouldn’t be surprised if their first move is to remove 10-119 battlegrounds completely.

After we’ve let them know that’s a bad idea they’re going to ban turning your experience off, remove heirlooms from pvp, and remove experience from pvp.

By now we’re six months in and morale is flagging, and with 8.2 on the horizon they’ve announced a final fix to battlegrounds- they put them all back, exactly the way they were.

We all breathe a sigh of relief.

1 Like

You’re agreeing with someone saying “I cannot join a BG, from 10-119 without having at LEAST 3-4 twinks on the enemy team,”, I’m simply stating that with the 48 toons I currently have active ( not including the ones I’ve had to delete to make room for my altoholic problems ) I completely disagree with that statement. If you’ve got something other than a complaint on the forum to back it up, I’d be interested.

With all due respect you are not the owner of the forums or a mod. It’s an opinion which I am entitled to as are you. Thanks.

1 Like

Oh I low level pvp, and I see the debacle it’ become.

1 Like

Your dude could have been geared by now.

3 Likes

If they never messed with it in the first place, there wouldn’t be any pro-twink or no-twink threads. People would just know seperate queues are how the game has almost always worked.

1 Like

Or he could be twinked by now.

1 Like

If Blizzard never implemented experience to BGs, this argument wouldn’t be happening either.

8 Likes

That argument is so stale and overused. Experience has been in battlegrounds way longer than combined queues.

Twinks allowed vanilla, tbc, legion, bfa, vs wotlk, cata, mop, wod, Twinks not allowed. So its even, so i guess we’ll see on the next expansion where the pendulum swings.

And combined queues has been in battlegrounds for longer than non-combined queues. What’s your point?

3 Likes

Don’t forget Separation happened at the tail end of WOTLK.
Vanilla, TBC, WOTLK, Legion, BFA - Togetherness.
Cata, MOP, WOD - Separation, which birthed the unhealthy “Re-roll Subculture” of “Twinking”.

We can all be beautiful together, in a somewhat controlled environment.
Together.

Congratulations, you’re wrong.

The current situation is fine as it is. I just leveled another alt and did pvp the whole time while leveling. I did just fine, won some, lost some and had some matches where I beat teams with twinks and we had none. All I needed was enchanted heirlooms and keeping up with my gear on my non heirloom pieces.
Going to level 2 more alts and will pvp on them the whole time too.

Levelers are beginning to get the message, so good luck with your queue times.

1 Like