First of all, I’m a programmer, if I program my software to randomly do task A or task B, setting the percentage for the randomness as 50% vs 50%.
Now when the software did task A or task B, did they decide to do that task based on their own consciousness? No. Because if that counts as consciousness we would’ve been taken over by skynet already.
Sharing straight up facts. Tattoo people don’t judge your ink. They understand you went thru the pain and there’s a nice mutual feeling. I dig it
I also ended up with a discount on my shoulderblade tattoos because the guy working on it got super hyped about it. ( we tipped him well anyway so it all worked out )
near 20 million people, entire cities are known for being lg+ (like Seattle), how is this not an issue. You are way, way downplaying something that has the strong chance to destroy our country, and impact the world (in a massive, unrecoverable way).
So, in this super far off (un)reality you’ve fathomed, the world is just too gay to procreate at a reasonable rate? As I said, this argument isn’t grounded in reality. Of course I’m aware of the slowing rate of growth of some populations, but you’ll notice one thing these civilizations have in common: industrialization. It isn’t “promoting” the LGBT+ lifestyle that’s slowing population growth, it’s urbanization.
Furthermore, even in the… ridiculously unlikely scenario you’ve presented, there are manners in which population growth can be cultivated simply with the use of technology and science. It’s already being done, in fact – by LGBT+ folks wanting a family of their own.
The fact that the best arguments in favor of blatantly discriminatory and, frankly, cruel dogma that advocates destroying lives – ACTUALLY destroying lives and not just hypothetically – speaks a lot for their illegitimacy. In the modern age, it’s time to do away with these harmful, primitive superstitions. We’re above this.
Oh oof, I meant the experience, “you either hate it or you love it.”
Apologies, I’m up very much past my bed time, lol typing with 1 eye open, and becoming extremely …uhm, leaving certain details out of what I say…might be a good time for me to say g’night!! hahaha
Putting aside that we are obviously way, way more advanced then the ai’s we can make (or even animals are way more advanced), are you saying that we cannot program ai to make choices based on learning?
Certainly this is not the case! AI can definitely find their own path out side of if statements, and loops. In a similar way, we and animals can do the same.
I encourage you to travel the world, specifically to parts of it where a culture was predominate in one time, and then a few years later ceases to exist there.
Sarcasm and insanity are not mutually exclusive. You can do both. It’s fun. You should try it. I’m having a tea party.
Who says we haven’t? If it was done correctly we’d never notice… until it was too late. My neighbors phone can start his car, turn on the coffee pot, answer the door when he’s not home! How many can spell without the red squiggly line correcting them? Does your text app finish your words or do you type it all in?
Skynet is here… it’s just waiting for the exact moment to destroy us all.
Still waiting on mine. Was told years ago I’d be getting one. The blue lied. I still haz no hat.
Same with car people (the circle I run with). Lifted truck? Lowrider? Rice rocket? Lead sled? Muscle car? We all hang out. All that matters is the work put in and the love of the vehicles.
Except hybrid/electrics… to us they suck. Every try and modify a Tesla? Total nightmare. No freedom to make it “yours”.
I know English and quite a bit of Mandarin, am looking into going to Taiwan in the very near future, and hail from a heavily mixed family that tragically imposed upon me the same repulsive sorts of dogma you’re touting here. I’ve seen plenty of the world already and I hazard a guess at saying very, very few worldly people would agree with the viewpoint you’re arguing here.
None of this will open your eyes to the power of cultural conquest. This is a very real threat to nations, and a very, very big concern to many. some countries are desperate for people to preserve their way of life (like holland).
You may choose to reject the argument on the bases of emotional rejection, that is your choice to self-blind and not to accept the truth. I respect the choice, but i think its biest and unfair.
Cultural conquest. Simply for insisting to exist as others do. As I said, imaginary. In LGBT+ people demanding not to be treated like animals, thrown off buildings, and simply being allowed to coexist openly, as we are, we are committing cultural conquest.
Contrived victimhood: the go-to fallacious appeal when in danger of being held accountable for your monstrous superstitions.