WOW needs more diversity

What “act” are you referring to that people have asked for here?

There is absolutely NOTHING in this thread that indicates that people want to have throw down sexual orgies going on in game. What they want is relationship inclusion.

The only perversion, as you so “eloquently” stated earlier, is you/your statements here in this thread, along with others who have made just about the same assumptions in why the LGBTQ+ community wants some relationship acknowledgements in game because it is YOU who allows your pitiful little brain to go straight to sex acts and that isn’t what they are asking for.

It’s nice that you admit that you’re obtuse and ridiculous. It only shows what people already have taken from your posts.

Name one. It cannot be a Bible reference.

Do, tell me how am I making you gay?

If you had any shame, you would go to church and repent for doing the opposite of what your religion is based on: non-judgement. Or do you want me to start quoting the bible on throwing the first rock?

Oh, please, you are the only drama queen here. All you have are insults, no real argument.

Whatever our species progresses into, it won’t be thanks to you, with your bad reasoning skills and your moral code based on 1000+ year old book. The antithesis of progress is to continue to look back instead of forward.

But comparing homosexuality (natural, genetic, and common in several other species) to bestiality and pedophilia are a new low. I draw the line in people like you. Literally, the worst type of human.

1 Like

I blew up, so my apologies . But hated never solves anything. In the end, no individual is better than any other. But, whaeve floats your boat. I’ll stop caring.

I’m genuinely puzzled what it is I’ve said you’re upset about. Is it because I painted humor over what’s a rather ridiculous argument against more representation that’s strangely common? I make no apologies for lending parody where it’s deserved.

If I must be so sobering and literal with my points to get them across: To say that LGBT+ is not “needed” because society is already accepting enough of it, when just the topic alone is enough to stir controversy (as it has many, many times over in this thread already) is just ridiculous.

People don’t know what real hatred is when it comes to this topic in first world countries. Want to know how gay & transgender people are treated in Muslim countries? That’s flat out hatred.

1 Like

I gave you compassion by telling you, you are doing evil things. You can considerate it a form of a friend telling you to stop doing drugs that can kill you.

in both situations, both actions are wrong, immoral, and evil. They not only destroy lives, but also society as a whole. Your actions and the actions of those like you, not only kill cultures, and nations, but are contributing factors to the decline of us as a species.

Wow does not need LG+ characters ( and as a game dev, i can tell you its very unlikely to happen for technical reasons ). Keep your live style out of games and the public and in the bedroom. Have some shame.

2 Likes

Yes, I do undertand they take it to the other extreme.

Jesus man :confounded:.

I am actually muslim (from america i converted 13 years ago). Islamic law does not prohibit homosexual relationships, but it is very, very clear about the act itself (the sexual intercourse) and its punishment (if all conditions are met, like a person refuses to give it up) is undoubtedly, death

Those laws however are not enforce-able or really compatible with the western world.

Interesting note here: Federal law does say that homosexual marriage is legal, but in some states, the act itself is still criminal. Part of our original laws in the united states accounted for things like this, actually, this is why adultery leads to the victim party of the marriage to gain most of the wealth of the marriage, because originally we as a nation were founded on religious position.

Over the years those laws have reached a point of needing to be revised, but in many cases just because of oversight and logistical problems, they have not. None the less, it is still illegal in some states (though i think legally it could be overturned).

Hello my oppressor.

I have no horse in this race… I don’t even have a horse, but had to comment on this part:

Shame is internal. It’s like offense. It can not be given or taken.

Also:

2 Likes

If you were told your judgemental dogmatism is damaging to the well-being of those simply exercising their innate lifestyles, would you view that as “compassion”?

I’ve yet to see the homosexual equivalent of anything akin to the Crusades or mass terrorism – events that aren’t just stories in books that’s been translated and re-translated over and over again in countless languages without basis in the actual world. Those have actually destroyed countless lives.

I’m aware of the 2nd part, but the first part…interesting. I’m not religious in the slightest, but religion in general is fascinating to me(I like learning about different cultures and seeing things from their perspective). Looks like I’m going to start reading up on Islam and I’ll be done learning about the big 3.

Oh, yes, thank you for insulting me and all people like me. You are such a great friend.

you mean YOUR actions. Because I’m a good contributing member of society who dedicates his life to helping other people with their problems. I might not be a great person, but I’m sure a lot better than you. Forget WoW, the WORLD doesn’t need more people like you.

Keep your whole life out of everywhere and into your own house. I don’t want poor children that have not developed good coping skills to have to deal with your hatred.

1 Like

I want to raise an important point while we have a topic like this, that is really important for the opposing side (the drama queen lg+ individuals) to really take a look at the positions of others posted in this thread.

I have a really important rhetorical question to ask.

How does the way you are acting when opposing positions (like mine) come up and you throw a fit, help us progress as a species?

This is extremely important to ask, if our species is to get past this, we really need to think deeply and seriously about this topic. Nations will fall from this, and cultures will die.

Imagine if you wake up tomorrow and the Chinese do not exist anymore, or the Mexican culture has died off. This is a great loss for us as a species, and in ways part of us have died.

This is what sexual immorality leads to. Socrates and Salahaden ayubbi (the salahadeen in the middle ages) talked about this.

Both of them stated something to the effect

“if you want to destroy a nation, or a people, you do not need armies, you need only to allow them to commit acts of sexual immorality in public, and to spread its idea”.

Aren’t you the one throwing a fit here?

2 Likes

The worlds leading scholar in islamic law (who recently passed away a few years ago) was directly asked this question:

“if two men live together, who love each other, and do not have sexual relationships, is that allowed or is it forbidden?”

The answer was

“There is no evidence that this is forbidden, it is however strange, however if they do have relations they have indeed done a extremely evil thing, and for that there is serious punishment”.

How about you stop wishing for our death before we have a conversation?

1 Like

No, not at all. I am being very mature about this. You have a position, and i have a position. The only difference is you and your supporters make up no more then 1-2% of the worlds population. This is why i labeled this as a “disease”, because often in the west we are trying to “understand” why people like you are the way they are, and how to “cure” it. Interestingly, these terms are used as stated here.

I am not insulting you, that is something like “your farts smell like bee’s wax” or “your nose is as shifty as a river”.

That s an insult. I get you are offended by my position, or more accurately, defensive. You just need to wisen up and recognize that many have positions like this. You chose your life style, so you will need to deal with the fact that people have opposing opinions.

It is for evidence, and fact to prove who is in the right.