I’m not talking about WoW.
Because thats what a single player game is? Idk what you’re talking about.
Even the original Wacraft games had optional co-op / pvp modes. Yeah, it was clunky to do, but you could technically play with/against other people.
An offline WoW game won’t happen.
Seems, you’re dragging your nonsense into my stuff. So, I’m just going to leave you alone. >.>
You don’t seem to understand that WoW will be a single player game. You can turn off chat and pretend that everyone is an NPC. For all you know, they are. If the content is doable without human interaction, then it’s effectively a solo game.
And you don’t seem to understand that I was talking about why Blizzard hasn’t made a single player warcraft game. Separate things that you’re trying to act like they are not.
They remastered the WCIII game, and it was a big flop.
People don’t have the attention span for SP games. The audience interested in the WC IP are not going to play it.
And the ignore list you go.
sigh
He’s one of those that makes me roll my eyes every time I see them post. So out of touch with reality it hurts
Imagine an RPG with good yet close graphics to wow, with all the quests from beginning to end, all the races, companions you form relationships and rivalries with and whatnot. Reputations which actually matter. and it’s World of Warcraft.
I know it’s impossible, but I like to sit back and imagine it sometimes. I’d ditch wow as it is for it.
People have been playing wow for years. They get tired of wow, and then they ask for wow to be another game, otherwise they’d have to admit having sunk thousands of hours into a game they don’t like anymore.
It’s an aversion to change masquerading as a request for change.
I think it’s unfortunate, but Blizzard makes more money selling a cosmetic item or mount on the store than making a new game. There’s very little chance they’re going to invest thousands of hours into a SP WC game when they can just create a virtual SP game with the current game.
Oh, poor you. Your poor little eyes roll when someone expresses an opinion you don’t wike. Oooh ohh.
And now you’re on my ignore. When you age over 5, do let me know. Enjoy and have a fantastic day.
How can I let you know if I’m on ignore? This is what I’m talking about. Passive aggressive crybabies that can’t tolerate anyone of a different point of view.
In any case, happy thanksgiving.
1 Like
Oh I’m not being passive about it. You want to troll people, I will be actively aggressive. But again, have a fantastic day, and have a delightful Thanksgiving.
Happy turkey day buddie.
(Raises 
)
C’mon, everybody knows MAGA stands for Making Attorneys Get Attorneys.
1 Like
By this definition there should be no solo content at all…which isn’t going to happen. They made leveling dungeons have AI. Then they added some group/solo end game content separate from the AI stuff.
More options is good. There is already solo content, they have just added more. MMO means you are all in a world together. It doesn’t mean everything is group content. If grouping for dungeons is so much better than it will be what everyone does. If it doesn’t happen then well sounds like it was bad group content and suited to solo or semi solo better. Let the community figure it out.
Nice strawman ya got there chief.
Not so strawman as you think it is. WoW has always from its inception been designed to be more solo friendly then it’s competition. Over the years the competition has become more solo friendly then WoW, is it really all that bizarre that in response WoW in return goes back to what defined it by becoming more solo friendly then it’s competition?
1 Like
Just because it’s, “Massive ‘Multi-player’ Online: RPG” doesn’t mean it’s necessarily always cooperative. There can be multiple players online and not require grouping with other players.
The idea is that you “should” group with others, but there’s nothing saying it has to be that way. Many people solo content all the time. Tanks have been given a lot of survivability that enables single player activities where multiple players are normally required.
Adding the ability to group with bots doesn’t take away your ability to group with players.
Edit: By the way, I get it. If it weren’t for forced socialization in online worlds, there would be very little social groups forming. That’s just human nature. People tend to only be as social as they need to.
2 Likes