Clearly wrong. Crit bonus from Boomies, damage bonus from Arms Warriors, improves EA for Rogues - there’s actually a long list of talent specific raid buffs and debuffs in TBC that is much reduced in Wrath.
Except most of those are not considered necessary or result in only 1 of that class/spec being brought. I’ve never heard anyone say we have to have a boomkin in TBC, will they bring one sure mages love big crits, do they consider it important no.
I’m still not quite sure how this matters. None of us are arguing that dual spec isn’t a good feature or doesn’t provide additional customization, like, that much is all obvious.
The question, is whether it should be hamfistedly jammed in to a gameplay environment that it never existed and thus we have no precedent to even conceptualize how much it would impact the overall feel of the game in terms of moving further away from TBC-experience, and our argument is “too much, it would make it feel less like we’re actually playing TBC”.
2 Likes
No, you have no understanding of words. Reported for trolling.
1 Like
How is having the option of 2 specs not extra customization? My character can literally do more with dual spec than it can without it.
I think…reading comprehension is necessary here…
Yeah, make a game of No Choices. Give all classes all spells all at the same time. No need to choose. Free customization.
In fact, combine all games into 1 game. No need to choose. Just do it blizzard.
Yes yes it is, how is my character with dual spec less customized?
Give it another shot.
Oh right I forgot, you are blindly just #nochanges
I am not arguing no changes…although I do try to stick to it philosophically, it’s not even what I’m arguing. Literally the next paragraph illustrates an argument that is clearly not specifically “no changes”.
2 Likes
What argument do you have against dual spec besides #nochanges?
1 Like
You see, for Blizzard, once you add something you can’t take it back out once it fails or screws things up.
Blizzard has, rarely ever in history, retracted a change that wasn’t universally disliked.
If they ever reached the point where they believed it was worth adding, there’s likely no turning back.
So this isn’t a situation where we can just “test the waters”. Unfortunately we are left to our own devices to decide if it would harm the integrity of the intended experience or not beforehand. Clearly adding dual spec hasn’t been a priority, since they haven’t done it, so you’ll collectively have to get through to Blizzard that it is indeed worth adding and will not compromise the project for so many others.
1 Like
Flying would like to have a word with you…
Technically you can boil any argument that is aligned or whos’ purpose is rejecting a change to “no changes”, and I see you’re set on doing that for the purpose of attempting to invalidate opposing arguments, but I doubt that’s going to be the golden ticket to convincing Blizzard it needs to be added.
1 Like
Haha, your memory is fuzzy if you don’t recall that there definitely was and still is a portion of people who thought flying was a mistake.
“It ruins world PvP”
“You don’t take in any of the scenery because you fly over it”
Etc etc.
And to some degree Blizzard buckled to that with achievement requirements for flying in the past several expansions.
If you thought that, then why did you post words back to me? 
And then blizzard tried to remove flying and lost millions of subs.
Not really there are any number of changes that I would say have legitimate impact on gameplay, for example transmog adds a new reason people want gear.
Dual spec doesn’t have any actual in game impact anyone can show.
1 Like
Of course dual spec impacts gameplay lmao
1 Like