With near universal approval can we get a response about dual spec please

Which noone has been able to explain any actual negative impacts.

:fire: :snowflake:
:shield: :crossed_swords:
:pancakes: :waffle:

Dual Spec.

1 Like

We’ve defined plenty you just have the memory of a goldfish and can’t retain information beyond a day. :fish:

2 Likes

You keep on misappropriating my desires to a sense selfishness. When have I ever said I want this for me?

If you look at my post history, my desire has always been for the sake of my friends and my fellow guildies. I’m fine where I’m at.

Unlike you, my desires begin and end at what people other than myself want from this game.

You say this after you tinfoiled Ziryus and I somehow coordinating some “story” in another thread?

:joy:

Certainly aren’t considering me or people like me.

I’m finding a very small difference between just you and “your closest friends playing the game”.

1 Like

You not liking it just because #nochanges is not an actual in game negative impact.

It negatively impacts the game because it makes the game less like the game I’m paying to play (TBC, btw, is that game).

Right that is not an actual in game impact.

How is a change to a fundamental design aspect of the game not associated with an in-game impact??

1 Like

A) it’s not a fundamental change, it’s aan adjustment to a mechanic that already exists.

B) the impact is an improvement for some and a non impact for others

We’re not even on the same server. Why would I give a care about you?

If anything, I’d get fed up with you given I’d suspect you’re as bad at listening to people in-game as you are at listening to people on the forum. Cases in point: the conversation you’re having with Ziryus right now and the fact that you’ve convinced yourself that the sole purpose for my being in disagreement is just to spite you.

You don’t think there’s anyone on your server who would reject dual spec? :face_with_monocle:

1 Like

Funny story, I actually met one who did reject it. Incidentally, he also liked saying the N-word a lot on Discord.

Anyway, you’re saying I should respect his opinion, right?

You are now equating the rejection of dual spec to being a racist.

Yeah I think…

Uh…

Is this the WoW version of Godwin’s Law?

Please tell me you didn’t just actually say any of what you just said. You have effectively permanently nullified the validity of anything you ever have to say about any subject forever if you actually, truth to word, meant any of that.

1 Like

I didn’t equate anything. You asked me if there was anyone on my server who would reject something and that was the first example that came to my mind. I really don’t remember much else about my interactions with this guy.

Like I said, this was incidental.

Anyway, are you saying I should respect this person’s opinion or not? What was the purpose of your original question?

Definitely not his opinions on race, but I see nothing unreasonable about his opinion on dual spec.

Here in lies your core issue though, you can’t seem to discuss a thing in an isolated context, it’s constantly attached to peripheral issues that are unrelated.

What you’ve done here is probably the worst case of it, because you’ve essentially tried to make it look like it’s a “racist kind of person” who would not want dual spec.

I can’t think of any determinable reason otherwise why on earth you would pick this sort of example.

2 Likes

This is actually your issue, not mine. You can’t narrow down people to isolated contexts. You’re basically cherry-picking people according to what you like about them and discarding the rest.

In the end, it’s all about you.

The guy is black. He liked to quote lyrics from Biggie Smalls. Only person equating racism is you, my dear sir. That’s your context.

But see how you rushed to judgement before you really knew anything?

Ah I see, so you present a clearly misleading anecdote, in an attempt to catch me in some weird gotcha that I’m sure any 3rd party reader would look at and think you are the mental age of a high schooler for actually attempting.

This conversation has gone down a pathetic route, thanks to you. Please see yourself out.

3 Likes

Anyone else would have ignored that particular because it was inherently irrelevant. I even said “incidentally” to signal that. Because it has nothing to do with anything. I just brought it up to show you how you think. Just to make the point that you’re not actually as invested in whatever nuance you think you are.