I am sadden to hear that, thought I was getting though.
Clearly not, oh well.
Why would you ever think you were influencing my opinion? You haven’t made good arguments. There’s a middle ground between being a fan boy and being dumb, lol.
Well it clearly is indefensible. There’s no excuse for not being able to make a simple conclusion then getting mad about it.
2 Likes
Guess been insulted does matter do you butter cup.
Whose mad, this is fun. Kinda feel bad for this thread though, oh well, this afterlives short was 
anyway.
Not really. You’ve demonstrated a path of being unable to make good deductions or good arguments so far. That’s a you problem.
Mad or a troll, only reason for your dramatic whinging about the cinematic.
4 Likes
You know damn well I’m regularly linking things, even going into the game and taking screenshots and uploading them just to post, I just had no desire to put in that modicum of effort for someone who is adamantly bitter and indignant and tedious.
Besides, you did it for me, how generous uwu
3 Likes
For the record, it wasn’t intended as a comment on your character. Just a general thing that seems to come up more lately. I mostly knew where it was since I looked it up for some random reason the other day. Just hoping not to see more ‘you look it up’ overall.
2 Likes
And you seem to lack a clue, not sure if your intentionally dense or merely simple. Congrats either way.
Clean your nose off.
So what would you do instead? Keep in mind that blizzard intentionally did it to hint at a connection between Draka’s covert mission and Illidans assault on that same base.
So please, how would you do that scene differently while still keeping the hint?
1 Like
And yet I could make an easy, straightforward conclusion about the cinematic like most people that escaped you. Hmm.
1 Like
You really didn’t make any arguments. You just a link a source which I conceded post ago.
You may have patting yourself on the back to hard to notice though.
Yvenathilm made a more direct response to your post. Which chose to ignore.
What? There was never an argument about the Valkyr. I thought we moved past that ages ago.
Mainly because Yvenathilm has a lot of theories. He might be right, I don’t know. They tend to be rather speculative, but it is whatever.
1 Like
I was arguing Derez and Baalemealt.
Your link the post and join in, I been wondering about you been go on about.
Your only point I conceded, just been having fun sense.
But you kept on with me, kinda shows you priorities doesn’t it.
Ah, so you’re confused. I’ll point you back to where it actually started.
My original response included information about the Valkyr and about the cinematic. But I haven’t been talking about the Valkyr since then.
That I’m more interested in pointing out bad criticism than uncertain speculation, sure.
1 Like
Would be more interesting, but hey, to each their own.
So been arguing about my arguments with Derez and Baaleminlitez? Strange interest.
I’m personally a huge fan of the idea that Maldraxxus has regularly kicked the Legion’s buttocks for millennia untold. It’d make sense: Non lich king Arthas sent four Dreadlords teleporting away in fear.
4 Likes
Responding to bad criticism on a public forum made for discussion, yeah, lol.
1 Like
Discussion are typical on the topic, but hey. If it moves you.
Which is what I responded to. Criticism of part of the cinematic. With the thread being about specifically that part of the cinematic.
1 Like
Don’t forget the heaping piles of stubbornness and pride.
I think it’s not a bad idea, but that our first introduction to the concept was reused assets was definitely a misstep in my opinion, as it made me think “Wait… are these actually felguards or are they just something from Maldraxxus that they thought looked close enough?” So I didn’t have a “Whoa the Legion!” moment, just a “Wait, is that supposed to be the Legion or am I reading into it too much?” moment.
1 Like