Why do we need to change how 2pc works

All I’m hearing is “I don’t have an argument, so I’ll make up numbers.”

Tell me you haven’t played this game in the past without telling me.

Not all tier sets were talent-specific.

1 Like

Because it is, makes specs feel less unique lol.

All I’m hearing it, “this is beneficial to me, so I’m going to say we not me

Right. But they’ve always been class-themed. Not generic. Which is the topic of this thread.

They are still class themed.

Just instead of each spec in a class having its own 2pc. Its each role in that class.

All rogues have the same 2pc since same role. Pallies have diff because each spec is a diff role.

1 Like

Then you never read the forums last expansion or got the survey. This isn’t about me whatsoever.

They ARE class themed. Did you even read the article? :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

1 Like

I meant spec specific. :yawning_face:
But what exactly is screaming Priest about this tier set?

  • 2pc: Your healing spells have a chance to apply Insurance! to their targets that heals them for 805,686 over 15 sec. Insurance! is consumed if an ally drops below 40% health to heal them for 386,756.

Which is my point. It’s a step closer to generalization.

Yes because this thread is thrilled and super excited about these changes so far.

Lets take a glance at the WoWHead comments:

gotta save some money by not doing thier jobs hugh

Not sure if joke or bad casino humor …

Oh no, are all set bonuses “casino” ones? procc based tier sets? are you kidding blizzard?

Go for even less afford. Good.

Blizzard is cooking a massive BIG L

“How can we disappoint our players even more?”

Clearly I am the minority here. You’re so right (as usual), this is a huge improvement that everyone wants.

3 Likes

Ugh can’t wait to see Hunter 2pc and Frost/Unholy. :joy:

1 Like

But the 4p literally forces you in to talents. Holy priest 4p forces you to take apotheosis

4 Likes

Nice backpedaling. Because that’s not what you meant at all.

If you aren’t going to be informed before you come into a discussion, then I suggest not engaging.

You’re done. Not engaging further when you don’t read and then backpedal. Have a good day.

A part of me feels like Blizzard is trolling with this 2pc

They have to be

1 Like

Yeah something like slam does 5% more damage when the target is below 1% hp, don’t worry it will be completely balanced !

Also this, there’s nothing stopping Blizzard from doing that again for the 4pc of a spec

To act like this solves the problem of being forced into a talent when that’s currently a thing now with a bigger investment is shortsighted

2 Likes

The notion that I said class specific not spec specific was absurd to you because the article is very clear about this matter.
But when I inform you I just made a typing error (a very common one) you can’t believe it?

Whatever pushes your agenda I suppose.

1 Like

Oh look, their initial examples are a Priest and a Warrior, like they always are.

Since they’re the classes they work on first and always spend the most time on, and everyone else can pound sand.

Surprised no Paladin, though.

You can see that Warriors is just “chance to increase damage by 15%”

Would work the same for Shaman

Yeah they did give fury warr a lot of attention this tier hehe

I guess thats what they all were this season too huh

Like I said a year ago when hero talents were announced:

And then a week later when Blizzard Did Their Usual Thing:

1 Like

As someone who’s gonna be going back and forth between Arms and Fire in S2 I hope the 4pc is interesting.

I do enjoy current season tier bonuses for Arms now the most.

Watch the tank 2-piece be a boost to block and parry. :headstone: druids.

1 Like