People care because Blizzard has a terrible track record of balancing literally anything. Nobody wants to be weak when running around killing stuff, which ends up being the primary means of doing any content in the game.
Do you want to play a Hunter who takes twice as long to kill everything compared to your buddy Jimmy who made the better choice?
Who is that fun for?
I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who said “I wanna be weak and struggle to win fights, that’s my gamer fantasy.”
Your nerve was struck before you were even replied to - why else would you spend your first post ITT insulting min/maxers if you were devoid of emotion?
Start your own groups and don’t care about min/maxing then. Create your own precedent. It isn’t up to anyone else to assure your participation in groups.
Certainly don’t enable insulting players for not playing your way, either. Nobody told that guy he has to min/max, he’s just injecting his preference into other peoples playstyle and insulting them.
There’s lots of different players that like to play lots of different ways. It’s not just casuals and the 1%. Covenants are about more than just player power, it’s story and choices and immersion. There’s a lot more to playing a game than just numbers.
I’m not insulting anyone. I’m just pointing out that changing the covenant abilities won’t suddenly change min/maxers from being completely biased, so why change it?
One would probably be upset if I treated a job like a game. If I treated this longtime casual-dominated game as a job, it’s natural that people object.
But keep trying to say I’m bullying people for stating the fact that zealous minmaxers objectively treat this game like a job.
No, you aren’t. But the guy I am responding to is, and you are taking up more issue with what I say than the insults he says. That means you are enabling him.