It was, and moved the CST/EST stuff to Chicago.
Do you have a specific contra-point to present? Your entire argument is based around me, rather than the point presented that refuted your supposed point.
Do you have a specific contra-point to present?
Yes.
That you shouldn’t jump in and randomly spew “information” that can be easily discredited, in an attempt to “prove” something that is not true.
Vøøðøø:Do you have a specific contra-point to present?
Yes.
That you shouldn’t jump in and randomly spew “information” that can be easily discredited, in an attempt to “prove” something that is not true.
The point being that realms were based on blades is the point, the rest of it is red herring devised to deflect the topic of the argument from the point.
This whole thread is a bit like watching someone try to teach a toddler to perform brain surgery. It isn’t going to work; you’re wasting your time.
The point being that realms were based on blades is the point
Yes, but the point is that realms are no longer tied to specific blades. Cloud architecture, whether you love it or hate it, can shuffle those work units to any blade at any time, or execute multiple work units from different realms on the same blade.
Hardware and Instance are separated by a Virtualization Layer now. The world is not as you think.
You say “first couple of days”, Blizzard says “a few weeks”.
They say “a few weeks” is when they’ll remove layering. I’m saying “the first couple of days” is when almost every single player will be trying to connect at once.
This whole thread is a bit like watching someone try to teach a toddler to perform brain surgery. It isn’t going to work; you’re wasting your time.
Tu quoque , it’s funny how many fallacious arguments people resort to when they are at a loss and losing a debate. So which alt are you?
I’m saying “the first couple of days” is when almost every single player will be trying to connect at once.
If the realm populations drop fast enough like you claim, they will remove layering earlier.
The point being that realms were based on blades is the point, the rest of it is red herring devised to deflect the topic of the argument from the point.
You are the ONLY one deflecting the topic. We have been addressing the topic.
To the point… No, we have not been lied to about layering.
Tu quoque , it’s funny how many fallacious arguments people resort to when they are at a loss and losing a debate. So which alt are you?
Is it as funny as a guy who resorts to saying this when his points melt into nothingness?
Vøøðøø:The point being that realms were based on blades is the point
Yes, but the point is that realms are no longer tied to specific blades. Cloud architecture, whether you love it or hate it, can shuffle those work units to any blade at any time, or execute multiple work units from different realms on the same blade.
Hardware and Instance are separated by a Virtualization Layer now. The world is not as you think.
And what point does that argument address? A strawman you built to chop down?
And what point does that argument address?
realms were based on blades is the point
THIS POINT ^^^^
a bit like watching someone try to teach a toddler to perform brain surgery
/tapsout
And what point does that argument address? A strawman you built to chop down?
Dude!! You are LITERALLY arguing the argument and not the topic!! Can you take your own advice, please?
Vøøðøø:The point being that realms were based on blades is the point, the rest of it is red herring devised to deflect the topic of the argument from the point.
You are the ONLY one deflecting the topic. We have been addressing the topic.
To the point… No, we have not been lied to about layering.
Vøøðøø:Tu quoque , it’s funny how many fallacious arguments people resort to when they are at a loss and losing a debate. So which alt are you?
Is it as funny as a guy who resorts to saying this when his points melt into nothingness?
More spam, no points, only attacking the arguer as has been consistently observed. You won’t illicit an emotional response from me if that is your purpose.
More spam, no points, only attacking the arguer as has been consistently observed. You won’t illicit an emotional response from me if that is your purpose.
JUST LIKE THIS ^^^^ Happy?
If the realm populations drop fast enough like you claim, they will remove layering earlier.
Sure they will.
Vøøðøø:More spam, no points, only attacking the arguer as has been consistently observed. You won’t illicit an emotional response from me if that is your purpose.
JUST LIKE THIS ^^^^ Happy?
Do you have something relevant to present? Or do you prefer to continue using red herrings and ad hominems to argue?
Do you have something relevant to present? Or do you prefer to continue using red herrings and ad hominems to argue?
Right back at you bro…I have made the points just a few posts up. You just ignore them because they go against yours.
The emotional response from you?
Na.
Eloraell:No. Two years later when they rolled out Sharding, they completely reworked their architecture. It no longer works like that.
Not to mention, wasn’t that about the time they closed the Phoenix and Dallas datacenters?
Ðavyjones:This story mentions 27 data centers… but not who owns them… Prob still with AT&T… I STILL cant include links… WhaaatTF
Thanks man… Got caught up in other things… Now to go do some reading!!
Vøøðøø:The point being that realms were based on blades is the point, the rest of it is red herring devised to deflect the topic of the argument from the point.
You are the ONLY one deflecting the topic. We have been addressing the topic.
To the point… No, we have not been lied to about layering.
Vøøðøø:Tu quoque , it’s funny how many fallacious arguments people resort to when they are at a loss and losing a debate. So which alt are you?
Is it as funny as a guy who resorts to saying this when his points melt into nothingness?
Vøøðøø:And what point does that argument address? A strawman you built to chop down?
Dude!! You are LITERALLY arguing the argument and not the topic!! Can you take your own advice, please?
Vøøðøø:More spam, no points, only attacking the arguer as has been consistently observed. You won’t illicit an emotional response from me if that is your purpose.
JUST LIKE THIS ^^^^ Happy?
Vøøðøø:Do you have something relevant to present? Or do you prefer to continue using red herrings and ad hominems to argue?
Right back at you bro…I have made the points just a few posts up. You just ignore them because they go against yours.
The emotional response from you?
Na.
Have you READ your posts mr sun shine?
Like I said way up in the thread.
Servers come from unicorn farts right?
Vøøðøø:No, it was realms per blades, you are just trying to back track and save face pretending to know more than you do.
I do know bro. And you are hopeless.
You will now post something claiming to have the logical high ground when at this point I just don’t care to argue with you anymore… It’s pointless. . It was pointless last night. . it’s even more pointless now.
Sorry man.
And which of these last posts aren’t red herrings, ad hominems or strawmen?
And which of these last posts aren’t red herrings, ad hominems or strawmen?
The first one, for starters.