We've been utterly LIED to about Layering

Today in the Beta is the big Classic tournament, in fact it is the last tournament of the Beta. There’s plenty of streamers participating, giving us plenty of views of the beta. However, other than streamers there is fewer than three to four hundred people total online this particular Beta server (the PvP server).

With that said layering has already caused tremendous issues for this small amount of people in terms of getting everyone together. People had to be invited to ‘layers’ to see their friends despite their being less than 400 people on the beta server.

I thought layering was supposed to only activate if servers reached their max pop? And I thought layers were supposed to be full of thousands of people? If that is the case why are a FEW HUNDRED people getting layered like crazy in the beta? This is not what was promised, this is straight up sharding.

113 Likes

it’s easy for blizzard to lie nowadays, they’re like that EA woman about lootboxes.

71 Likes

It’s unfortunate because I’ll play classic, but when everything starts phasing in and out of existence, I’ll lose the urge to keep going.

105 Likes

And here I was thinking that it was BETA and that they were intentionally trying to test layering. What was I thinking???

48 Likes

How the hell are they suppose to test a system that is ment for thousands of people on a beta with only a few hundred if they keep true to the thousands during the beta? You weren’t lied to. You were just taking things out of context/not thinking.

33 Likes

haha, you guys are funny, so how are they going to test layering with 200 people, what is the point? They have their tech turned on to test it, wysiwyg.
What you see is what you get. The entire purpose of these beta players is to advertise their game, they aren’t “testing” layering on 200 people. lol. You guys will never see 500 people in 1 area ever again, unless you play on a pserver. You know what they they call people are are fooled over and over again right?

25 Likes

It was obvious from the last stress test that they were capping layers at a FAR lower number than a ‘server size’ amount of 3k or whatever. Sadly, layer caps aren’t dictated by server stability or authenticity. It’s done for convenience, according to Ion.

9 Likes

Evidence? I have yet to see any difference between sharting and layering, only been told there is one. I have seen, however, sharting of people randomly, which is in effect the same thing. Theory and practice are different.

3 Likes

Imagine for a second that you are not an angst ridden hater. Imagine that you had a beta and the most important thing you needed to test was this new layering tech… would you turn it off near the end of beta because there were less people participating? If you answer anything other than “no” you are lying.

12 Likes

Exactly. This makes it seem like there’s no difference between sharding and layering. People are getting stuck in like 50-100 people ‘layers’. Seems like sharding to me.

20 Likes

Different servers were different sizes, so you know they could test it. Eventually they dropped it down to 2 servers and it was basically unplayable. They would eventually bump it back up to 4.

If you were seeing fewer people it was because you were on one set up to be lower.

Hint: It’s beta, and they’re testing it. There isn’t thousands of people to test on, so it’s based on way smaller numbers.

You weren’t lied to, you just don’t understand why beta tests exist.

12 Likes

You are just pulling things out of your behind. You don’t know that is what they’re doing. Layering is not supposed to activate with that few people.

7 Likes

We know they’re adjusting the number/size of layers because they said they were going to for testing purposes.

But I can’t get hysterical with that kind of logic so I’ll just ignore it and signal boost a non issue like the cool kids.

5 Likes

So it’s either a bug on beta or they’ve altered the tech intentionally to test it. What are you spazzing out for exactly?

5 Likes

It’s the latter, they made a bunch of tiny layers for testing purposes.

1 Like

No they said they’d be using layering regardless for the first 2 months.

What is the purpose of testing layering with 200 people…when the real cap is going to be 2,500???

It’s crazy.

5 Likes

Suuuure ya did. Don’t mistake me for your gullible colleagues dude. If you don’t understand the absurdity of creating 500 worlds versus 500 zones, I don’t know what else to say to you.

3 Likes

The only thing I might have mistaken you for is anything more than someone just trying to get a rise out of people.

I don’t know what else to say to you.

5 Likes