We want RDF

It’s also quite annoying that the best way to coerce people into doing 5mans is by reserving items they need. That just adds to toxicity of 5mans where RDF would literally remove all reservations and if you wanted to help and guarantee your guildies get items you would queue as 5 ppl.

1 Like

RDF is a feature not content.

7 Likes

I didn’t play vanilla, because that version of classic is a complete meme. TBC sucked without it. Wotlk 5mans suck without it. Even though RDF came with ICC it was available for half of the 3.x lifecycle and its ridiculous to act like it was only a small part of wotlk.

2 Likes

Strawman alert.

Guild banks is a feature. Didnt launch with tbcc. It did come early in tbcc, but it wasnt in at launch. This shows that they can chose to delay features as well. But hay, historical facts doesnt matter to you right?

I see you still don’t know what that means.

You’re the one who admitted that your vast social network actually couldn’t provide the same results as RDF.

2 Likes

Less than half. 48% and thats from a content drought heavily inflating that percentage.

But it honestly sounds like you just dont like wow in general, you just like rdf. Good news is plenty of other games have it. If you think tbc sucked because it didnt have rdf and wotlk sucks without rdf, it really does sound like you just dont like the game in general.

So they can make stuff come earlier?

You’re always so good at proving yourself wrong.

5 Likes

How is a feature coming early a like you even said yourself - a precedent for a feature being delayed? If anything this shows they could implement rdf sooner if they wanted to.

400ms batching didn’t get removed until like WoD/Legion, so they’ve also shown they can sometimes be competent and ignore the classic clowns that push for a bad UX as well.

1 Like

They can, doesnt mean they will. It also shows they can chose to selectively withokd features. Which they have stqted they have no plans on adding rdf to wotlkc. So we have historical evidence of them witholding features AND them saying rdf won’t be in wotlkc.

No, it means I escape 5mans very early into the expansions because I’m not terribad at this game. Then without RDF I don’t have a reason to revisit them as alts reach max level so I instead skip them and go straight into raiding. It’s your precious 5man community that loses out on all the players that skip them.

They could, but they have said they dont plan to implement rdf at all. The guild banks shows they can chose to not have a feature in the game and if they want add it kater… And they have chosen no rdf now, or st all for wotlkc.

Yea I don’t think rdf is coming, that doesn’t make it better for the game tho.

Not having rdf is a huge loss for wotlk classic.

But it’s blizzard so I expect no less, it has to do with profit margins and some nerd on the 18th floor said it’s more profitable to not include it.

5 Likes

I mean if you chose to be a raid logger thats a you problem.

I dont need dungeons. I do them for fun and to help other people. But acting like rdf will all of a sudden make the game alive for you is a joke at best. If you chose not to do them now, you really didnt want to do them to begin with.

RDF does not prevent you from doing that.

4 Likes

Thats your opinion. Blizzard, me, and many others disagree with you.

The lack of rdf doesnt prevent you from doing dungeons. You chosing not to do them is your own choice.

Actually in many cases it does. Me choosing to do dungeons does not magically create players to do them with.

3 Likes

I choose not to do them now because there is an unneeded timed barrier of entry where I’m required to spam and wait around for ppl to join a dungeon. RDF solved this with the daily heroic implementation that meant every dungeon queue would pop in reasonable time because someone would be bucketed into your dungeon.