If youâre flagging posts that donât break the forum CoC then you have no business complaining about a waste of space or trolls as all youâre doing is swamping the mods with garbage instead of actual real reports.
Just because you donât agree with something doesnât mean you should flag it.
The common thread here is that they want to throw as much automation as possible at the problem in the hopes they can stop paying actual people to moderate.
Iâm not convinced heâll ever grasp the concept that some of us care more about fishing than raiding. So is anything really gained by going in circles on these issues over and over?
Would be nice if there were a place where people with thicker skin could argue the merits the game without the super sensitives getting their panties in a bunch
I actually enjoy fishing too (Iâve got my Legion fishing pole which actually had a really neat quest line towards the end, I got my panda raft years ago as well as my water strider before it had to wear shoes to know how to walk on water).
I wasnât replying to thread topic, just the poster who was expressing that people against LFR donât vocalize their opinions in anything but a âLFR must be set on fireâ type of way, which I think I did nicely and I havenât seen anyone actually address any of the points I made since then, just swing the conversation to some judgmental post about âwell thank god we canât ignore people cuz this guy would be talking to himselfâ and âheâll never grasp the conceptâ
The larger subreddits are definitely that way, as are those based around divisive topics (like politics). The smaller and/or hobby based ones are pretty chill though.
This has all been true since pretty much the existence of the modern internet, though. Long before reddit or post voting appeared, the small to mid sized phpBB-type forums usually managed themselves alright. As they grew larger they inevitably turned into sludge pits.
So it seems the secret to quality online communities is to stay away from (or at the very least, strong limit discussion of) highly divisive topics, to say focused, and to say somewhat small.
I never used the ignore feature much. And if I did, it was due to harassment and usually only for a short time.
Thus far, I only.have one person Iâd ignore. Because I donât pay attention to who I quote half the time and said person seems to think Iâm stalking them. Even when I try to back them up on something, they jump down my throat and flip out at me, quoting things from other posts I made as they stalk my profile.
Yet, apparently, Iâm the problem.
So Iâd rather just not accidentally reply to them in any thread ever again.
I mean i basically have an ignore list already. I have a list of known trolls/morons and i donât respond or read their posts. Imo we should have an ignore feature.
I would still like to be able to ignore a few posters Iâve identified whose only purpose on the forums is to troll. Since theyâve been repeatedly banned for it I think it is fair to be able to ignore them. A maximum of five (5) slots for ignore would work for me.
Its surprise re-implementation would be hilarious. Post alt outing, the justifications and mental gymnastics of some of the more⌠prolific posters would be brilliant.
Great comment. Yes, youâll find too many folks who are incapable of understanding how to practice actual free and open discussion without the need to punish and/or scapegoat those who express ideas they disagree with.
They are interested in mob mentality, not thinking. I would surely hate to come to meet such in real life.
As an aside you may find that a right is something that can be âtakenâ as well as 'granted". A privilege is something that can only be granted.
Thus anything that can be wrested from the hands of those who hold it is a right because it existed all along. Privileges exist only as things offered and cannot be taken because they never existed beyond that offer.
just something to think about when one is imagining whether something is a privilege or a right.
If you wanted to, could you simply take it? Well then its a right.
âŚand now on to the question of whether or not you SHOULD.