You made the claim that I didn’t have a point in my first post. My first two posts offered an alternate reason as to why Blizzard wouldn’t do it. That is a point.
That does not mean every single thing we say to eachother from that point on is related to that point. Conversations typically shift. New points are brought up. Old points dropped. Sometimes old points are picked back up again. This is very basic stuff.
So yes, the first post (which you specified) offered a point of Resource vs Lazy.
The tongue-in-cheek response wasn’t until later, when you decided to make another claim against me, despite me already making that claim.
No, when you said “That’s what i said” and confirmed with “So that’s what i said, glad you can admit it” to my “My no is different than yours”, you basically dismissed the difference between our no and said you only care about the “No” part.
This is where i said there’s no point in it anymore, since we both said No anyway, there’s no reason for me to argue about it.
That was right after you made the comment that shifted the topic. At that point, I had already given you my initial point and you gave me yours.
My point… at that stage of the argument, was to inform you that I was well aware that they weren’t going to change it, which had you read my prior post, you would’ve known, but you didn’t and that kicked this all off.
That’s not what you said. Maybe what you meant, but your words said something different entirely:
That’s not you saying there’s no point anymore. That you saying there was never a point.
PSA to anyone else going for the demon hunter look who doesnt wanna be a silly elf, with the new tint enchants you can have some colored glaives look alikes with felgore double blade from hfc(even sheathes like a glaive on back)
Now we just need a green tint but im assuming we’ll get a few new tints with shadowlands or covenants(already have blue and new purple tint in 8.3)
First i said its not happening, proceed with some example, this is where you said you disagree first (for some reason you even assume i talk about time related issue). This is where i consider your disagreement was with my reasoning why its not happening, to which i said its not about free time, they don’t make store item because they have free time, making store item is part of their working time, because subs is no longer their metric of success, this is why hd remodel is not happening.
-You assume they have free time (but lazy), and they use that time to make store item, implying they can stop being lazy and use that “free time” to make more ingame item.
-I said, no, they don’t have that free time, all of their resource were used, no free time, no lazy guy, which mean there’s no time to make HD remodel.
One is “They can but they’re lazy”, the other is “They just cant”.
After i explained why they’re different, you ignore it and focused on “both are no hd remake”.
You’d be singing a different tune if you weren’t a legendary stealing monk ripoff.
That’s bull and you know it. Was Azzinoth a demon hunter? Are the Wardens demon hunters? Glaives are weapons, DHs just happen to make that their signature.
And rogues/warriors have more claim to those weapons being iconic than demon hunters. Demon hunters were not a thing when they were put into the game.
Because you brought up time. I disagreed that it’s a time related issue.
Yes, this is our mere disagreement on the reason why they don’t.
One is They can but they’re lazy, the other is that they can’t due to time constraints because of other projects (like store mounts).
First, that’s a strawman. I’ve pointed out multiple times, to you, that there are different points in this thread because you were typing as if there was only one, so spare me this.
Second, to tackle what actually happened. I put your opinion as to why Blizzard won’t aside. Again, as I said, the reason is that it would be pointless. Neither one of us can prove our side of that specific argument as right. I gave you my view. You gave me yours. There was really no point in continuing it.
That would’ve been the end, but you made a comment that led into all of this. Had you read my post and noticed that I said that I agreed that it wasn’t going to happen, you wouldn’t have made your reply, and I wouldn’t have needed to correct you, which in turn, led to all of this.
No lol, i said if you only care about the no part (in which you said it twice with “That’s what i said”) then there’s no point in arguing anymore, basically we both agree that it won’t happen.
If you only care about the no part, there’s no point in arguing, this is objectively true.
Then you post “Just because i disagree, doesn’t mean i have no point”, this is where you should stop.
When you posted that statement, i assume you still have something to say, this is where you went bipolar and said you care about the reason.
If you care about the reason, then it turned into They can (but lazy)/it can happen vs They cant/it cant happen.
Another lie. You realize we can still see your earlier posts, yes?
You specifically said that my first post didn’t have any point. You never made such a disclaimer.
Wrong again. I already explained this to you. You’re just making every attempt to avoid it. The entire reason for this conversation continuing after we each gave our reason for the “why” was to inform you that I was already aware of what you were claiming. That is a point. A different point, but still a point all the same.
Me replying to you doesn’t mean I’m bipolar. You can chill with your out-of-the-blue cringey insults.
This is where i imply if you think our no is the same, no reason to argue anymore.
V
Its only wrong if you care more than the No part, considering you imply “I also said that” twice, you basically say you don’t care about the difference, the only thing that is the same in our opinion is “it doesn’t happen” part.
Again, its not about you replying or not that makes you bipolar.
When i said your no was
You replied with
meaning you only care about the “not happening” part, you dismiss/omitted the lazy part (basically turn “they can but lazy” into simply “it wouldn’t happen”, at which point you might as well agree with me (if you don’t like the you agreeing with me part, you can replace it with we agree with each other, its the same.)
Read that reply of yours again. This is, again, something I’ve already pointed out.
“We agree that it won’t happen”
“We agree on everything”
These are two different claims.
I don’t care to discuss the difference between our reasons for the ‘why’ beyond what we already did. I mean, I think it’s pretty obvious where that leads. “My opinion right and yours is wrong because I say so” from both sides.
At that point in the conversation, it was about you failing to realize that I agreed with you on the matter of “will Blizzard do it”. It was no longer about the ‘why’ as we both said our piece.
Calling someone bipolar for dropping a point like that doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.
I see you typing and this has gone on for too long. What started as a simple callout to re-read my post, turned into this (which let’s be honest, I was a bit antagonistic in that reply). At this point, we’re repeating our exact points over and over. I’ll read your reply, but I don’t see myself continuing this for much longer, if at all.
We both have better things to do with our time. In short, you know my stance on this. I know yours.
If you disagree with part of my post, then you should elaborate the part where you disagree, instead of repeating “that’s what i said” post.
I disagree, my “no” comes from they themselves said “subs number is no longer the sole measure of success” and “it didn’t account for services and store transaction”, i didn’t say no just because i said so.
Please point your “no” evidence that they do have a free time and that the devs are working lazily.
No it was you failing to realize that i realize it, which is why i proceed with, “so you’re just agreeing with me” statement.
Wrong, i know mine and have an evidence, you don’t.