Yes as an MVP op should have known better.
My bad i forgot Illidan was a Rogue/Warrior using swords.
I never said we share every opinion. What?
Come again?
1 Like
Rare moment where I agree with Byuck and it gets flagged. Didn’t even know that worked on MvPs.
Hey, demon hunters. Rogues and warriors had it a decade before you even existed.
8 Likes
Everything i said in this specific topic, that they cant do remodel.
Dude are you ok?
You have to be pretending at this point.
“You agree with everything I said in this topic”
Sure, if we ignore the fact that I disagreed on something lmao. I can’t dumb this down anymore for you.
You made two claims:
- An HD remake will not happen
- Blizzard will not do an HD remake because of this reason
Agreeing with the first does not mean that I agree with the second. Why does this have to be explained to you?
Let’s say you do do have different opinion than mine, when i said “No i said it wont happen because X , you said Y”
You shouldn’t respond with “So i said it wouldn’t happen, Glad you can admit that”. with “Can you read?” garbage written all over it.
You should say “Yes our opinion are different” or “Yes, i disagree with your X”, this is very basic.
Don’t quit your dayjob OP…
There was nothing wrong with saying that. It showed a disconnect in the argument when you made the statement, “deep down, you know it won’t happen”. Considering I had just stated, in clear text, that I agreed that it wouldn’t happen, for you to make the comment suggests that something went over your head.
And considering where we are now, my call was right. You became under the impression that I agreed with everything you said, even though I didn’t.
This was implied in my very first response to you. You missed it.
No, when i said “Our no is different, my no is based on X (No resource) and you’re on Y (Lazy)” it emphasize on No resource vs Lazy, to which you switch the focus to “our no is the same”, then i said “Oh if you’re focusing on the NO part, then there’s no point in arguing because you basically agree to me”.
Then you proceed to confirm it with “So its what i said, glad you can admit it”.
And now you shift back to the resource vs lazy part.
It was a tongue-in-cheek response. You can’t be this oblivious…
I stated that I agreed that it wasn’t going to change. You made the comment “deep down, you know it won’t happen”. I told you that I just said that. You then tried to change the argument. I snipped the first part to highlight the difference.
“You know it won’t happen” is very different than “you know it won’t happen for this reason”.
Look at all the hate over such a silly thing. This issue will die so fast come patch day.
You can still farm them for the other classes and use them when the BC time walking comes around.
1 Like
Next time read the whole post then, they teach you this in elementary school.
No lol, you said “Our opinion are the same, do you have trouble of reading?”
Then i explained “Our opinion are different, the focus is X vs Y”
You confirmed with “So its the same” implying you only care about the no part.
Then i said “If you focus on the no part, then i don’t have any reason to argue”
And then you said “Just because you disagreed, doesn’t mean i have no point”
Then i asked “which point that you disagree with”
You said “X (resource) vs Y (lazy) part”
You moved from focusing on the No part, to lazy vs resource part and back to the no part.
I just want my Nelf survival hunter to be able to use a moonglaive =/
This is outrageous. It’s unfair. How can you be able to equip the Warglaives of Azzinoth, but not be allowed to mog them?
2 Likes
I did. That post didn’t imply otherwise. Piss poor deflect, yet again.
Not quite the same. See, when we look at the actual quote, what I’m referring to is as clear as day. Can’t quite paint that under the stroke of “he’s agreeing with my opinion as to why Blizzard won’t do it”.
I just explained this to you. At this point, you’re just playing dumb in an attempt to save face.
Watching you flail about is hilarious, though.
Do you agree that it’s not happening or not?
The answer is yes.
When i said “My no is around no resource your no is around lazy”, this imply my focus isn’t around the “No” part.
You then shift it back to the “No” part with “So its what i said, Glad you can admit it”
Yes, you’re cornered and say “its a tongue in cheek answer”, which is why you’re in the wrong here, your tongue in cheek answer shift the focus, when i shifted as well, you take it as im disagreeing with you.
Wut? They can mog to their weapon skill proficiency and every leather option that isn’t a class set…
4 Likes
I know your stance.
Because you brought that into question. Telling me that deep down, I’ll accept that it’s not being added, after I just stated that it wouldn’t be added, is what made me call this out.
I’m not even remotely cornered. You’ve yet to make any claim that stuck. It’s as clear as day that it was a tongue-in-cheek answer. There’s really no other way you could take it. I went out of my way to snip the beginning of a post to get the point back on track.
Considering that you just acknowledged that in this same quote "You then shift it back to the ‘No’ part with ‘So its what i said, Glad you can admit it’ ", you’re being disingenuous and it’s showing.
Any feeling of being cornered is what you’re projecting.
If it was clear, when i said there’s no point (which mean i already know we both said no, and thus, i consider there’s nothing to argue anymore), you shouldn’t reply with “just because you disagree with me, doesn’t mean i have no point” implying you have something i disagreed with.
To which i followed with “What point are you disagreeing me with?”, you said “Resource vs Lazy”.