No. In live they are called 7th legion incinerators. And they are setting the Vulpera on fire.
2 Likes
your are wasting your own time , you are the one who keeps on talking
7th Legion Incinerator
“Some can be seen using their spells to set Vulpera caravans on fire, while others are holding vulpera captive.”
You are full of it.
1 Like
Go do the assault again. Watch what the NPCs do. Then come back to me.
The wiki states very clearly, and their quotes reveal, that not a single Vulpera was harmed.
- Give us the supplies, and we’ll let the vulpera go!
- Ha! Your supplies… are already ruined…
- I return… to the earth…
- No one’s getting those crates!
- People can leave, but the war supplies will burn!
- Supplies destroyed… nothing else… matters…
- The Alliance… will take… Vol’dun…
- The Horde cannot get these supplies!
- The Horde… must… be stopped…
- The vulpera should’ve kept their noses clean!
- They should’ve… just… surrendered…
- Why don’t they… understand?
- You! I knew the Horde was behind all of this!
- You’re too late…
- You’ve stooped to using the vulpera to smuggle for you? Pathetic.
- Your war supplies will burn!
Not sure what else I will have to say. You’re wrong, i’m right.
No idea. We see the npcs attacking the Vulpera, so.
Then I guess that’s just some abberant code. Lorewise, the Vulpera were unharmed. Simple as that.
Think what you want. At the end of the day, the Alliance are the evil invaders setting vulpera and their homes on fire.
1 Like
Fixed that for you. I won’t argue that the Alliance were the invaders. Or that they burned their homes. Problem is, said homes were also used to transport supplies to a faction that had commited genoicde against the Alliance. If someone was trading with the National socialists during the second world war, do you think we should have let them continue? Because I don’t.
2 Likes
Lore wise the attack of the Alliance prompted the Vulpera to join the Horde. So, no.
3 Likes
Loving the mental gymnastics being used to protect your fragile, good guy schtick. Alliance did some evil to civilians. And the hypocrisy of burning them is beyond you.
“The enemy burned our homes and people. Let’s do that to a neutral race!” - Alliance.
Pretty sure the Vulpera would have also done business with the Alliance too before that act of evil.
3 Likes
Undercity and Nathanos would like to have a word with you.
1 Like
Well, they clearly didn’t. In the hypothetical scenario that they did, you’d be right. But since they didn’t, you’re wrong. the wiki shows what they really did.
Because we burned their caravans. Not the vulpera. You are free to link me proof to the contrary. But so far, i’m the only one who has supplied proof. proof that shows that the incinerators targeted, and only targeted, the caravans themselves.
You blew it up yourself, and Nathanos betrayed the Horde when he remained loyal to Sylvanas. Trying to avenge him would put you at odds with the Horde itself.
2 Likes
The NPCs are fighting…
1 Like
It’s still gone. Wouldn’t have had to scuttle the city were it not for the actions of the Alliance. It counts, you just don’t want to acknowledge it.
If Nathanos doesn’t count than neither will Sylvanas, right? Because she’s no longer Horde. Is that how that works?
2 Likes
Do I have to keep linking this?
And we wouldn’t have attacked it were it not for Teldrassil. You have nothing to stand on.
There are two parties responsible for Teldrassil. The Horde, and Sylvanas. Since she abandoned the Horde, she is no longer part of the Horde. But she is the one who holds the most blame. Killing her, will thus partly, or rather mostly, avenge Teldrassil.
And Nathanos counts as being part of Sylvanas’ “faction”. So that’s who we so far have made to pay.
You want it both ways- you (you in particular) complain when Alliance actions are whitewashed and then you complain that Alliance does far too much evil, but then you trail back saying that actually the Alliance doesn’t do far too much evil because Blizzard won’t let them .
I see this conveniently used depending on the context of the thread but reeks of contradiction. Which one is it?
3 Likes
Dude, what?
This is what you said 
My post here
Was pointing out that your assertion that stuff hasn’t been avenged was incorrect.
This is where Nathanos comes in. Tyrande literally says she is killing him as part of her vengeance for Teldrassil.
So, again, your assertion that stuff hasn’t been avenged at all is incorrect.
I can stretch it to that Teldrassil have been partly avenged. But since Undercity wasn’t destroyed by us, that Nathanos at that point wanted to die, that Sylvanas so far has remained at large, and that the Horde itself hasn’t done squat to make up for what they did, it’s a long way from being done.
Well, all the rest remain unavenged and unreclaimed. Gilneas, southshore, Theramore. And they most likely will remain like that.
It was destroyed because of you (Alliance).
1 Like