That’s not how that works. You’re making the claim, burden of proof is on you.
If you can back up that the “average player” has no access to heirlooms, by all means do so, but until then I’m gonna call you wrong.
3 Likes
Sure, then I can back it up as much as you can back up any of your statements; just like any of the twinks here have done. In my experience, the average player/leveler does not have all of those heirlooms, and even less enchant them. Only people interested in twinking enchant them.
Cite your sources.
I already did. You may want to stop quoting me if that’s all you’re going to say, though!
You cited no source.
Repeating yourself over and over again isn’t a source.
Likewise, and it doesn’t disprove anything I’ve said to repeat yourself over and over. 
I’m not here to disprove you. I’m asking you to prove what you’re saying.
If you can’t do that, that’s fine. I recommend not to claim something that you can’t prove though, makes you look silly.
1 Like
By saying that something isn’t the case you’re making a claim. You’ve made the claim the average player does have heirlooms, do you exist solely to defeat your own arguments within your own posts or something?
Do you want the definition for the burden of proof? You don’t seem to know what it is.
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo
You made the claim, I said you’re wrong. It’s up to you to prove that you’re right.
All this going in circles and deflecting is a pretty good indicator that I wasn’t the one who was wrong though.
2 Likes
Next time I level a toon I’ll SS all my Bgs again and you can armory people.
1 Like
Not at all, it’s like saying a particular someone doesn’t exist. You have no evidence to support that they do not, therefore there’s zero reason for you to bring it up at all or question my choice.
Though you’re also going in circles and etc, meaning by your own argument you’re wrong. Looks like you do exist just to contradict your own arguments.
Not really sure why you need to, we already established you twink your characters.
I’m going in a straight line. I’m asking for proof, you refuse to provide it.
Arguments without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
3 Likes
I don’t really need to but I will because it’s sorta my thing.
Then I can dismiss your argument, since you have no evidence; and mine still stands.
Enchanting heirlooms isn’t twinking considering you can send those heirlooms to any character of your choosing, the enchants don’t suddenly fall off your gear because you mailed them.
2 Likes
I’m making no argument. I want you to prove what you’re claiming, that’s it.
Clearly you can’t though.
2 Likes
You can do the same with some BoEs and white gear, doesn’t make it any less of a twink item. Sorry, try again.
I already did, multiple times over. Not gonna get any more quotes from me though, just additional clicks every time you post at me.
You didn’t prove anything.
2 Likes