They know Twink wasn't a term of endearment right?

Not with people who chose to willfully misunderstand, no.
Glad i could clarify that thank you so much for your contribution.

twinks originated for me in everquest where you had a low level character with really good high level gear since they had no level requirement to equip.

speaking of clarifying…

I suggest you read. Im not repeating myself to you.

you haven’t said it clearly once, my friend.

please stop attacking me.

I think OP somehow got ChatGPT drunk & stoned at the same time, then asked it to come up with a random essay on Twinks.

1 Like

Thank you for proving my point. Don’t answer, don’t clarify, just evade and accuse.

Someone who wanted an actual conversation and wanted answers to their questions would clarify their position until everyone could understand the point being made. You refuse to clarify because you have no point, you’re just stirring the pot, and that’s plain to see because you give this nonsense response even to people who are clearly trying to engage with you in good faith.

2 Likes

Folks, this is called schizophrenia

1 Like

That’s a lot of words, used in ways to create sentences, that express ideas.

it’s really not confusing. words can mean multiple things. “cool” doesn’t only describe temperature, for example.

and it has nothing to do with them.

i have explained more than enough in previous reply’s it would be unrealistic to ask me to repeat myself for every individual poster especially when they’ve already shown they’re coming from a point of view that would never try to meet eye to eye.

i guess this is a good faith argument right here?

If you want to have a good discussion, I would direct you to my friends who will not touch this game again, because of irreversible changes made to the game because of said market research data. None of whom would meet your assumption of the quality of their character that you are oh so brazenly branding me as.

I’m not the one you need to explain that too.

“A few people” huh?
Thats a funny way of saying 99% of posters here have no idea what you are talking about.
Literally scroll up. Nearly every post here is “?” “What are you talking about?”

So in this context, “spark discussion” = bait thread.
Especially when you cry wolf with trolling, being attacking, and claiming people are posting on alts rofl. When you can hardly even clarify your main post.

It wasn’t even a slur when it was made lol.
Its literally used by the gay community to describe how someone looks.

So no idea why this triggers you in 2024 other than looking for something to be outraged by.

Speaking as someone that has been in multiple abusive relationships, I don’t think you have any idea what that entails nor do you have any idea of what you are actually talking about.

Hello alt. Nice to meet you lol.

I’ve seen more coherent threads on the arkham subreddit…

And this, Folks, This is called ableism.

You do realize those human beings deserved to be treated better by you, no?

“Evergreen content”

Bahaha excuse me son but being im gay and an “otter” in the community twinks dont scare me. Youre being assumptive and rediculious.
Nice deflecting trying to say thats chatGBT. I have no need for AI to post for me.

Thanks for the morning laugh. Worth returning to read this at least.:rofl::rofl::rofl:

I find it intensely interesting that you keep trying to discuss something with someone who refuses to continue discussion with you. Like you don’t understand consent.

You can talk about the subject all you like I don’t care, hell even keep replying to me, but I’m not going to continue to feed someone who will conflate everything I say into something its not.

I do hope you’re well aware of that, as I’ve tried to make multiple people aware of that fact.

As to the assumptions of alt posting, There currently is not any meaningful framework to deal with a community of people abusing access to the forums by way of lending accounts to other people. I’m sure there’s all sorts of flags and suspicions that fire on the moderators end, but nothing proving beyond a reasonable doubt to action on them.
(which is an entirely separate post on its own)
which is to say I think my claims are valid even in the face of your dismissal of them.

As to your own suspicions about me, I do not care. I have full confidence within the evidence provided to the moderation staff that I am a genuine person with genuine concerns who deserves a place to speak on those reservations.

As does everyone on this forum.

Well, according to Urbandict, you are right about that, 'eh?