As for you, I did that on purpose to prove a point. You found my response immature, yes? When I gave you an actual response, you gave me an immature one as well.
You're missing the point.
My comment, petty as it may have been, demonstrated that I found yours to be, prima facie, rather silly. The natural response to that is to explain why it isn't silly. Something I needed you to do, because you'd simply asserted that no-such-thing could be done, ex cathedra. Indeed, if an assertion sounds silly and lacks supporting reasoning, it has little to its name. Thus, one elaborates; tell me why I'm wrong. You can respond with pettiness contemporaneously, if that's inclination -- go nuts.
Just saying that they can't put her in the room is nonsensical. You need to actually explain why this is
so important that it would bar implementation of a feature as central as an allied race, and as coveted as this one.
Instead, you nitpicked my typo. My problem wasn't your tone, it was your substance -- I actually made this clear.
You got me though, I had a senior moment and got two letters wrong in a name I'd already used correctly. Please tell me more about how adding an NPC to a room would destroy the fabric of reality.
My error was a small typo. Yours is a fundamental failure of logic. You're proving the content of that very comment to be true, as you desperately scrounge for points in the wording.
it really shows that this is entirely a matter tribe and not all a matter of argument
Indeed, despite multiple people calling this assertion into question, you haven't justified it at all. We are not objecting to the same thing, thus you've proven no point. Lest your point was that mine lacked substance, which I've covered. I didn't think justifying a claim would require this much exposition.
Perhaps I should have simply asked you, that would have been more proper. I'd just assumed that you wouldn't leave a major claim unsubstantiated, unless you thought it didn't warrant that, something I called into question.
Or you could have relinquished the claim as silly. If I could go back and do it over, I would tell you how to argue with me.